It’s not a bad price, but if I bought it, then I would have to look at it. ND.

The Aerostar was a completely under-whelming vehicle (i.e. utter garbage) brand new, so any price for a used one now is CP.

The Camaro just has horrendous visibility, the interior is cheap looking and feeling (how they handled the infotainment system is terrible), and the exterior styling is lacking. At some angles, it looks awful. To my eyes, the entire rear-end treatment is disgusting.

Crack pipe. Fieros have one of the worst interiors I’ve ever seen. Just terrible.

Such an ugly minivan now. It is so disappointing. We had a 2013, and it was a great minivan, but I would never consider buying this one.

I’d like to know the difference in how Ford calculates their payload value vs. how Mahindra calculates it. I bet the safety factor is a lot higher in the Ford.

No, do not need. Those are some of the biggest heaps of junk ever foisted upon the American car buyers.

SJWs ruin everything.

Crack pipe. Stock 240SX isn’t an amazing car, and that spoiler ruins it for me.

The stock seats don’t look much different.

Nothing. I have no interest in the meh-mobile.

The 6.2L still gets about the same fuel economy as the 5.3L.

Unfortunately, the EcoBoost is not nearly as efficient in real world usage. From fuelly.com for the 2017 model year trucks, you find the following.

I owned a ‘91 Nissan Sentra SE-R. I do not need to be told how fun front-wheel drive can be. The SE-R was superb.

Sleeker? That thing is ugly. Nothing but disjointed styling elements that don’t flow together.

“...because there’s no coasting, as such—whenever you’re off the throttle, you’re breaking. “ 

I hate these things, especially in light of the previous generation.

That is the ugliest Aston I’ve ever seen.

Too bad the back end has those ugly Camry inspired tail lights.

Don’t forget the Previa, which laid it down at a 75 degree angle.