bowleggedknockkneed
BowleggedKnockkneed
bowleggedknockkneed

And she has NOTHING to show experience, resolve, or character to be President. There’s no place to go but up based on the current idiot, and she would be a miniscule improvement I guess, as she steers more foreign govt’s donor money to the Clinton Foundation.

Admitting defeat with that lame zinger lol. Maybe put some more words together like T-H-I-S.

Yeah, most of them, actually.

The result was proving for everyone to see that she lied directly the family members of the deceased, to protect the narrative going into the election.

Until they find a decent goalie, they’re in trouble.

You should read some sources sometime that don’t tell you what you want to hear. “with nothing to show for it at the end of the day.” Other than proving she was inept as SoS where Ambassadors couldn’t get her on the phone, and proving she knowingly lied when she blamed the video.

Name something. Failure as Secretary of State. Smearing women who accused her husband of sexual impropriety. What else?

I’m no Hillary Clinton supporter and she looked terrible yesterday. She’s a sociopath, the way she lies so easily. However she’s going to kick the crap out of Sanders and win the primary in a landslide.

“Check your privilege” would have been great, from a woman who hasn’t driven or cooked for herself in 30+ years. She’s going to lose in the general election. She has nothing to run on other than “I’m a woman.”

She was also questioned by female members of Congress. So presumably, we need to put more women in positions of power, but how dare they ever be harshly or critically questioned. Quite the contrast. Jonathan Gruber was harshly questioned by Congress as well but not treated like a shrinking violet.