If she just went and baked a cake okay, that’s processing it. But posting a comment that has no substance besides stating “I’m going to ignore this to talk about my cake” is performative and gross. It’s wanting “likes” for talking about yourself.

Because it’s completely narcissistic to take something horrendous that happened to someone else and make it about you and your cake. If your way to “process” is by needing validation of your narcissism I'm going to judge.

What's the point of a comment like this? You aren't the only one to do it, sometimes people make it about animals or gifs...but why? If the article bothers you so much that you can't comment on it, then why don't you just not comment? Why try to get attention for your feelings and your cake on an article about someone…

“It’s very rare that someone is involved in a homicide case with someone they just had a baby with. It’s very early to make a conclusion as to what the cause, intent, motive and facts were to this unfortunate tragedy.”

This guy’s lawyer says: “It’s very rare that someone is involved in a homicide case with someone they just had a baby with.”

Says his divorce attorney Ronald Richards, “Him being violent is so uncharacteristic of the person I’ve known for many years.”The classic line of all friends, acquaintances and family of abusive people. FFS will someone just accept that you don’t know what is going on behind closed doors and that someone you may like…

[Adam Levine is] actually quite unpretentious and not a bit scared of exposing himself on camera and exploring who he is as an individual.

Given the comment about “exposing” oneself, sounds like she nixed the nude scene he desperately wanted her to do.

The comment about her entourage seems like he wanted to be best friends with her, but she was happy hanging out with the people she already knew and just having a professional relationship with him. The nerves!

So, she totally rebuffed his flirting and he’s taking his hurt fee-fees to the media, right?

The person who is against feminism and thinks it’s important to sunbathe her vagina?

Man wants to advance the cause of woman, tells 100 women to get naked for art. Yeah, I’m not impressed either.

Yeah, I’m not really thrilled with the reinforcement of the idea of women’s bodies as an “embodiment of nature” more than men’s bodies. The woman-as-nurturing-earth-mother-figure is not necessarily feminist. When it’s used to suggest that women are fundamentally different from men—more nurturing, more connected to…

It would be slightly less ridiculous if he solicited men and women. But only slightly.

The philosophy of the artwork relates to the idea of the sacred feminine.

Oh cool, white dude asking 100 women to pose nude for difficult-to-decipher performance peice about “the sacred feminine” for a bunch of people who are already too dense to give a shit about women. Thank you, smart arty man, for figuring out how to communicate for us! We should’ve just been holding up mirrors and…

This is a good reminder that the vast majority of men are not tweeting shit like this.

Congratulations!!! You are being awarded a Gold Star for Missing The Entire Fucking Point.

The thing is — this video will come as no surprise to any woman, but it obviously comes as a surprise to many men. They don’t have to worry or care about online harassment because their voices are the majority. Spaces are theirs to own.

So then the question is - if it’s a small majority of men, then why the hell has almost *every* woman experienced something similar? Even if it’s just an incredibly small minority of men, if that minority is disproportionally affecting a majority of women, is that not then a societal issue?