bourgeoisie
bourgeoisie
bourgeoisie

Honestly, even if she were a man and could be more aggressive, I’m not sure if that’s the right tack against Trump. This is how all his GOP candidates made themselves look foolish. The key to Trump is to let him get worked up and sound like a fool. Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake, which Trump

This is something I think a lot of people misunabout her. It drives me crazy when I hear people say there’s just something about her they find untrustworthy, but they can’t put their finger on what it is. First of all, she’s a lawyer. Second, she learned quickly in her time as First Lady that if she ever did say

This comment swells my heart w joy lololol

I think being assertive in his world means being really forceful and never letting anyone talk over you or interrupt you. That’s his approach for work/business, at least. If he acted that way with me, we’d have some serious problems.

i do...

It’s all explained in the Columbia Journalism Prof’s report. Essentially they waived their fact checking rules, which is a big part of the reason they’re being sued — reckless disregard.

oh my god, she’s like a living breathing Jim Halpert.

I watched the debate with my husband, whose criticism of Hillary’s performance was that she wasn’t aggressive enough. I tried to explain to him that as the first woman to get to this level in American politics, she’s walking a tightrope between looking too ‘soft’ and being labeled a bitch for being too aggressive. As

I loved when the debate was over and Clinton just peacocked across the stage directly in front of Trump with a big victorious smile on her face while he was still seething at his podium.

346.24: Crossing at uncontrolled intersection or crosswalk. (1) At an intersection or crosswalk where traffic is not controlled by traffic control signals or by a traffic officer, the operator of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian, or to a person riding a bicycle or electric personal assistive

He doesn’t say don’t stop. He says stop when pedestrian is right there, on the crosswalk, ready to cross and fully aware of the situation. Red car stopped waay to early.

Everyone at their table:

In my experience, when a company starts talking about “silos” what the executives really mean is, “I’m going to lay off a bunch of people, regardless of their function or the need for their work to have a viable product. Then it will look like the company has made a huge profit under my watch and I get a big fat

Around here it’s pedestrian in crosswalk. Pedestrian 20ft from crosswalk, driver still has the right of way.

Stop for pedestrian in crosswalk, not stop for pedestrian who is approaching crosswalk.

This is why you should never stop for a ped at a crosswalk with more than one lane unless they are already committed to crossing. It’s the equivalent of waving someone over across multiple lanes of traffic. The guy with the cam almost killed her by stopping for her before saving her with the honk

Before we condemn Ford of Canada we need to see what she asked for that generated the letter. The letter seems to indicate that she wanted Ford to either give her a different truck or give her money back. If this is the case, I would have to agree with Ford. They will pay to have the truck fixed, as they offer in the

I really wish she’d stop saying “Ford says this isn’t their problem”, when that’s not even a little what Ford said. Ford said she can’t return the vehicle, because WTF, of course you can’t, but that they’ll fix it under warranty. That’s them saying it’s their problem, and they’ll fix it for you. Not as fast as you’d

I’m always amazed when I see someone crossing a road and they’re not constantly checking all directions for some idiot about to run them down.

Now playing

Texting is a real problem in (what I assume is) Australia. Still love this motorcycle cop video.