There isn’t a lot of time to show such things when most of the movie is spend following other perspectives. Luke got a whole movie basically to himself in ANH, in TESB he gets half a movie and in ROTJ arguably the least. But by then he is a well established character. Rey has to share it right away with Fin, Poe, Han…

Oh please, Rey has been in three movies and thats it. Ashoka however turns up in everything Dave Filoni touches. Not that this is a bad thing, but its nonsense to suggest Lucasfilm is ‘forcing’ Rey on the franchise.

Right, books should fix their broken and problematic fictional institution in ways that pleases the current liberal left. Its entirely reasonable to demand that authors fix the racism in their fictional setting instead of focusing on writing compelling characters, character arcs and interesting stories. A story is…

“And sure you can terrorize a military into defeat. It basically just requires continued asymmetric pressure to sap morale and tarnish thier views of themselves and support for whatever war is happening.”

“And sure you can terrorize a military into defeat. It basically just requires continued asymmetric pressure to sap morale and tarnish thier views of themselves and support for whatever war is happening.”

It does. Terror doesn’t work as a strategy if you direct against a state. You can’t ‘terrorize’ a military into defeat. You can’t terrorize an institution into listening to you. Institutions don’t have feelings, they don’t get afraid. Terror works as an indirect tactic. Attack civilians, terrorize them and then…

No, a terrorist specifically uses violence against civilians in the hope that a scared populace pressures their government to give into the demands of the terrorist. That is why a terrorism has a bad name and deservedly so. Terrorists are too weak to attack the people in power directly, so they go after civilians who…

Because its a business. Same reason as why any other business would go public.

I think it would be better if most of the NPC’s just shut the fuck up, especially in the Tom Clancy games. Ubisoft has the annoying tendency to make their NPC’s whine and complain every five seconds and loudly calling out their next move whenever the player has tripped the alarm. No one does that in real life and it…

Judging from the god awful dialogue in GR:Breakpoint I already assumed they used AI to write it. 

You again put words in my mouths. I said its ineffective, inefficient, it doesn’t work, and that is what renders it morally inexcusable. Its killing people for no effect, no benefit. Are you saying you’re okay with killing people for no gains, as long as you claim to be doing it for some greater good? 

You are putting words in my mouth. I’m not saying people shouldn’t have fought against slavery. I am saying that turning to violence to achieve some form of social justice generally doesn’t work. If it doesn’t work, its not an effective method of achieving social justice, if its not effective method it becomes morally…

The French Revolution was an abysmal failure. They killed the king, introduced the terror that got so bad people were happy to accept an Emperor to bring some stability. Said Emperor then plunged Europe in a decade of war that saw hundreds of thousands of people die. And after that, they got their king back.

You’re joking right? The civil war didn’t really end slavery or brought equal rights to black people. It ended a certain form of slavery for sure, but that got replaced by other forms (neo-slavery) almost immediately. Violence freed Haiti and then plunged it into chaos and anarchy that lasts to this day. From all the…

Name 3 instances where using violence to gain equal rights actually worked out in the long run.

That is true. But at the same time, by not tracking parking it also makes it easier to make a walkable city, because people don’t have to cross oceans of asphalt just to get anywhere. I think the lack of parking in the game is where the developers show their Nordic roots, because Nordic cities aren’t as car centric as…

The latest DLC introduced pedestrian only districts, with roadways that could only be used by pedestrians, cyclist and some public transit/city services.

The original game is already people centric. People are the primary actors the game simulates, not cars. People can go into cars, or they can walk, bike or use public transit options. The simulation currently with all DLC included fully supports walkable cities. 

You know they released DLC that did allow you to build walkable cities. And mixed use zoning was always sort of possible. Mixed use buildings aren’t possible without mods, but you can always zone a neighborhood in such a way it supports mixed use on a neighborhood scale.

Sure, because Trans people and their supporters are all saints and can’t be assholes themselves. No, it has to be a false flag operation because LGBTQ+ twitter would never....