Surely even Ann Coulter would think twice before making a claim like that.

She claims it’s not the same because government would’t be forcing employers to pay for it...but it’s going to be part of unemployment insurance - something employers are required to contribute to.

That about face was so abrupt, she must have whiplash!

Obligatory “how is babby formed” reference.

In a column for National Review Online earlier this year, Delgado wrote that many rape victims mistakenly thought that had been abused because they had been “brainwashed” by liberals.

Absolutely. She was being kind.

You don’t have a point, you’re just flapping your figurative gums without a shred of credible evidence to back it up. Evidence has been provided and yet you just keep on flappin’.

The point of adding tenths would be so that you can get an accurate synch between the whistle blowing (or an incomplete pass hitting the ground, or a player stepping out of bounds, etc) and the clock stopping. For example, on a replay the refs could see that the receiver stepped out of bounds at exactly 0:08.8 instead…

No.

The subprime mortgage crisis should have forever sunk the notion of letting the businesses do what they want because they know best. Vidal was right, we are the United States of Amnesia.

Snort (hours in day) - I am well aware. Like many, my career of over four decades was tanked by rampant greed and unfettered and unwise boom growth. One of the companies is over 20 billion in debt. No possible chance of ROI. Ever. So they keep firing the very human resources that provide the product and devaluing what…

That is offset by the increased purchasing power of employees with more money to spend.

You argument is based upon the false assumption that businesses will hire more people if there wasn’t a minimum wage. Businesses only hire enough people to meet the demand for their goods/services. Removing the minimum wage doesn’t increase demand. It just increases profit margins for business owners in exchange for…

If a person works FIFTY hours a week, FIFTY-TWO weeks a year, they’ll make $10,400 in that year at $4/hr. That’s just GREAT! So wonderful.

...while they get rich. I cannot understand ANYONE who doesn’t get this. IF your business model depends on exploitation or starvation wages you SHOULD lose your business.

wait do you think that $4/hr an hour will keep someone off of welfare

No they wouldn’t because they’d be doing back breaking work and still be dead broke and on welfare. If we’re not requiring companies to pay living wages, then we’re subsidizing bad companies through the welfare programs that their workers are using in lieu of pay.

How fucking stupid are people in this country?