bort118
bort118
bort118

Its basically so Colbert himself can avoid criticism for NOT bringing it up. 

It’s always a difficult shift, to go from the “I came from nothing and no one believed in me” narrative, however accurate, to “I have a net worth of $200 million, an Oscar and 15 Grammys, but I still feel nebulously unfulfilled because people on the Internet are clowning on me and I found a grey hair yesterday.”

Dre isn’t writing his own lines, let alone someone else’s.

In a weekend where N.E.R.D. and Brockhampton just dropped two late year contenders for AOTY, this album seems especially lame and out-of-date in comparison. With all the great current producers and rappers Eminem could have collabed with, the fact that every beat on here is either some milquetoast Alex Da Kid/Skylar

You realize that in all those scenes, Xander was wrong, right? I mean, especially in the Angel scene, but pretty much all of those scenes, the audience is supposed to realize that Xander is wrong and being a dick. That’s why Buffy never actually apologizes to him, because he’s wrong.

Ah, I bet you judge books by their titles, too. Never mind the rest of the post, just judge me on the fact that I was a member of Whedonesque, a website that posted a lot of critical commentary on works by Whedon and included a lot of great members. But no, that would go against your narrow worldview of “Everything

You need to go back and take another look at Whedon’s work with a critical, objective eye.

Because I lack imagination.

Except you do eat tiny amounts of dirt all the time from fruit, vegetables, salad etc. Even a lot of processed food has sand in it as an anti-caking agent

He has a point. Harvey is a serial abuser. As far as we know right now (because 80 women haven’t come out against him), Hoffman was momentarily crude. What Hoffman did was wrong, but it doesn’t seem like it was behaviour he repeated throughout his career. There is a difference (a huge difference) between Harvey

Hey, I’m open to criticism, but you’re going to have to try harder than that. I didn’t write anything sexist... if you’re going to take a jab, at least try to be on point.

You have to click on the linked Sunday Times article, which you can’t read unless you are a Sunday Times subscriber, so no fucking clue. Maybe try a pop culture and entertainment news site that isn’t turning into absolute garbage.

What if - and I’m just spitballin’ here - movies aren’t necessarily an accurate depiction of reality, and this isn’t something to be overly concerned about?

You think people are walking around all day wanting to slit throats, and the only thing that prevents them is that the intended victims are awake?

jeeeesus...this article is obnoxious.

I mean, I’ve long since written Tom Sizemore off as scum, but the other villains of this piece are the girl’s parents. They didn’t want to take her off the production or press charges? Of all the revelatory details in all these articles, this one strikes closest to the gross heart of the greed and self-serving power

Your supposition seems even more likely after some poking around. Her post cropped the magazine so I went looking for the actual cover, and saw this cover of a February issue with Bhumika Arora in the process. Indian, not African, but they apparently don’t have a thing against kinky hair. I don’t know what industry

“I am disappointed that @graziauk invited me to be on their cover and then edited out and smoothed my hair to fit their notion of what beautiful hair looks like.”

Good. The Richard Spencer/Charles Murray/Breitbart type of racist wants desperately to be cool. Their entire modus operandi is trying to rebrand the image of “racist” from toothless hick into cool pop culture leader. (These guys are all either failed comics, screenwriters, or academics). They want to be Stephen

Yes, black people are why racism exists. Got it.