“Look here, young man, you’re trying to anticipate what I’m going to say, and you haven’t the brains enough to do it.” 

I wrote about this on the splinter article but these billionaire preppers are batshit.

For shame. This is the kind of salacious trash I expect from Buzzfeed.

If I wanted to read about the little guy getting screwed, I’d read more HamNo.

I never thought they’d have to back up the Brink’s truck because he wouldn’t be able to walk to it.

As if people who use tampons don’t know how to operate a little door next to a toilet?

Absolutely agree. Having your spouse cheat on you - and lie to your face about it - is devastating. I mean, if you actually give a damn about your relationship and are invested in it, that is. I was fortunate in that there were no children involved. That’s another level of investment.

I have a hard time feeling bad for folks who cheat while in a marriage that isn’t abusive or neglectful (I actually understand cheating under those circumstances, as sometimes it takes realizing someone else will love you—and actually love you—to find the courage to get out), and even less sympathy for folks who cheat…

The Trump family ain’t no germophobes, that is for sure.

Literally the only thing wrong with the headline was the word choice of “chanting” instead of “singing” or “rapping”. There was video, it was the VT women’s lacrosse team, they did use the word, and the coach did call it a “teachable moment”. Ergo, it’s clickbait (using word choice to make it more likely to catch…

Spoiler alert: Samer’s not better than this.

The acceptable terminology for a purposefully dishonest title that mischaracterized what happened is:

I don’t understand why you people who are freaking out about the headline. OF course the headline is inflammatory, and of course it’s editorializing. Writing “here’s a bunch of white girls saying the n-word a bunch” is also editorializing! You’re not mad that the Deadspin editor who wrote the headline is…

Click-bait

Sameer didn’t argue “context was irrelevant.” His argument is that the context of “I was just singing along to the words a black person said” is not a sufficient excuse for a group of white people to say it/sing it/rap it/whatever.

I do agree, though, they were not “chanting” it.

Clay, if you’re trying to “own the libs”, just say “nits”. It sure sounds a lot like a slur and it serves as a reminder that your children have been overtaken by lice; which is very low class.

So what, did you look at the Stephon Clark articles and think “Too challenging for me, better slam my head against the keyboard to make some #thinkpiece drivel!”

As the Handbook of Racial Rules notes, white people have immunity from any consequences for saying the word “nigga” when it’s within the context of a song. We regret the error.

“The fact of the matter is I did misspeak in using the term ‘CPR,’” Santorum said. His broader point, he added, was that kids should be joining organizations that focus on preventing gun violence.”

Is it though? I mean the guy calling for action in front of the council is really awesome, but I can’t take anyone serious with slippers, blue sunglasses, and Beats around their neck.