Was just thinking the same thing. They had a 1-2 year wild west run knowing darn well how easy it’d be to get money anywhere they want.

Bats with penises that won't fit in the female's vaginas. It's like a weird flex turned into an evolutionary trait.

“We are trying to develop a bat porn box, which will be like an aquarium with cameras everywhere,” said Fasel.

I was hoping to hear they were going to start using cheese.

Aardman tried that in 2006 with Flushed Away, which is CGI made to look like stop motion. But they went back to clay after that.

Let me fix that headline for you:

Pretty sure that the fighting-with-swords and Native American scenes are from an episode referencing (roughly) the 1602 timeline.

In case this site’s comment section (or the AV Club as a whole) doesn’t make it to 2024: It was an honor shitposting with you all on this continually sinking ship. We were the band on the Titanic, playing an infinite loop of Yakety Sax.

In response, Russell Brand took a page from The AV Club’s Godzilla show review: no comment.

100% about the tax break. The theatrical or nothing has nothing to do with it, outside of the fact that this film clearly isn’t quality enough to cary a theatrical run. If it was the ZAS would have sent it out there. It would have at least netted him one more release party to throw for his Hollywood bros.

Title makes it sound like a courtroom drama where cayote finally sues Acme for all their defective products. 

That’s literally the point. WB is no longer interested in TV movies, or direct-to-video, or direct-to-streaming. It’s theatrical or nothing.
Somehow this means that in-development films have to either be converted to theatrical films (a la Blue Beetle), or get thrown in the trash.

The problem, I think, is that…

A Looney Tunes movie with big names like James Gunn and John Cena attached,  surely it could've made some money, even if they just decided to bid it out to Netflix or someone else. Hopefully it gets leaked one day. I mean they released The Flash, there's no way this is worse than that.

They really need to adjust the tax code so that in order to claim writeoffs on completed work, you have to release that work to the public domain.

No horniness? Big fail. Totally unrealistic.

Saying that because chemical recycling hasn’t yet completely solved the plastics crisis we should therefore ban it, is like saying that because electric cars haven’t yet completely replaced gasoline cars we should therefore ban electric cars. Makes no sense at all. We need simultaneous multiple approaches to the…

Agreed. Does the remake have:

Its like a bespoke artisan shit sandwich , I mean its all really well made , and uses the best available ingredients , but at the end of the day its still something unpleasant that leaves you feeling shitty and sick afterwards .

It depends on what you dislike about the original. The darkness and sexual violence is still there. I actually liked Fincher’s movie better, because I felt that the original got bogged down in the minutiae of the book’s overly detailed magazine publishing world. You could tell that Blomkvist was a total wish…

you’re not serious about the italian job? really?