if i had $100k to spend on a car id absolutely wait and get a Lotus Emira

we already do but thats a flat tax and it disproportionately impacts those who are poor. In stead it should be a progressive tax geared and having less of these cars purcahsed new by wealthy who arent impacted by the tax and it keeps less of these gas guzzlers on the road as used cars in the future. Gas going up 10%…

yes but they should charge an additional fee and use that fee to help offset the environmental damage

I heard of someone in our highschool that was pulling onto the highway and the instructor said “punch it!” so she shifted to P

bummer i was looking forward to that odd looking van

yes consumers using more gas does affect fuel consumption. shocking i know

sports cars with high power dont get driven as much but large SUVs go on road trips all the time but are mostly used for commuting and pretending that someday theyll buy a boat and have two more kids and will be glad they have the behemoth then.

those who buy gas guzzlers have more income and the taxes impact them less but their excessive use of fuel impacts others and the environment

They should charge massive amounts more for inefficient cars like this.  the 420hp version gets 19 highway and this will likely get 15-16.  driving gas guzzling cars like this make fuel shortages worse and have a larger impact on the environment so a tax should be charged to help offset the damage they do, because the…

these sound great but for me thats about the only appeal

wasnt sure if you saw my post i made just after yours. i too owned a manual with manual everything then went to the newer model with an auto. year the auto sucks. the 2003 is a blast compared to the 2009. lighter, much better suspension, vastly superior steering, even the interior is better with more space. but being…

never realized how this car looks a lot like a lotus Emira and Evora combination

this is good. I fully expect this to accelerate as battery tech improves and continues to come down in price, and also when consumers realize they dont need so much range and can opt for cheaper lower range EVs where they arent lugging around 200 extra miles of range worth of batteries that they dont use

In 2008 i bought a 2003 manual base with manual everything even windows. It had 55k miles and i bought it for $5800. in 2011 sold it with 115k miles for $5500. Bought the 2009 auto vibe manual windows. It had 12k miles and was $10900. drove it to 2016 to 80k or so. Sold it with body damage for a discount to a friend…

I owned two pontiac vibes and they were the cheapest most reliable cars to own. The 2003 manual was the most fun but later got a 2009 auto because of a broken foot. The Matrix XRS and Vibe GT are both fun with their 6-speed manual and high rev engine. very reliable cars and that first gen handles well especially with…

cargo space on the mazda3 is 20.1, the CX-50 is 31
cargo space with seats down Mazda3 47, CX-50 56
also they are in no way competitors are you thinking the CX-30? it has a tiny bit less space than the mazda 3

does it still have that crappy torsion rear suspension or it is independent rear. cause torsion rear will kill the handling

VW almost made a factory modern version of this. 1900lbs with a 200hp ducati motor with a 12,000 rpm redline

VW almost made a factory modern version of this. 1900lbs with a 200hp ducati motor with a 12,000 rpm redline

I think marketing accidentally swapped the toyota and subaru names by acccident. Solterra totally sounds toyota