Because jurors turn their emotions into the facts.

Because, in theory, juries aren’t actually bound by the law. You can hand down a not guilty decision even if someone broke the law. Jury nullification is a real thing and a powerful one as it gives the people veto power over the legal system. Unfortunately, most people think their job on juries is to just ratify…

Zelda’s the main character. We’ve always played as them.

“multi-time award-winning anime film”

Crypto isn’t frequent use, it’s constant, high power use. Buying a used card is a gamble that just isn’t worth it or the hassle. Unless you buy from someone you know and what they used it for.

Brave to trust a used card after the crypto fad.

I don’t even count DLSS or FSR when considering performance, I just look at raw rasterization, everything else is running the game at a lower resolution.

“Call of Duty gamers are passionate, knowledgeable, and sophisticated.”

I’m more than inclined to believe that there was no actual “prank” and it was likely just straight up harassment at the minimum.

Any attempt at comment from the alleged shooter or their legal representation?  Forgive me if I don’t take Cook’s “simple practical joke” statement at face value.

Posting is his “passion,” he told the news station, so he’s intent to return to YouTube.

This is going to be a pretty easy win for Glowstick Entertainment:

Glowstick Lawyer: “Your Honor here is a list of every game that has used the word monster in their title before the existence of Monster Energy and a list of every game released during the time that Monster energy has had the trademark. We motion for…

Congratulations everyone. The best alternative is The Game Awards. A total advertising shitshow already.

Probably. FWIW, tradeshows and the like have always been kinda fun to walk around once in a while. You get to see some new stuff, give it a little whirl, and see lots of weird ideas come out of the woodwork too. That said, they’re still a basically a giant advertisement.

I mean that’s exactly what Sony and the FTC did on their own without Microsoft’s help. 

The argument from Microsoft refers to “advanced” consoles in an effort to dismiss the Nintendo Switch and focus on Sony.

It’s less weaponization and more Nationalism. That’s been a thing in Congress since forever.

Why is it always seem like everyone acts like it’s a dick move when Microsoft pulls this kind of shit but shrewd and savvy when Sony does it?

Whether or not MS can build their own successful IP doesn’t have any relevance as to whether this merger should be allowed by regulators. Mergers aren’t inherently prohibited by anti-trust laws. There needs to be a specific reason(s) to block any given merger and that reason is generally supposed to be “this merger…

Sure. Except we’re not talking about what MS should or shouldn’t do. We’re talking about the specific regulator concerns about the merger and whether or not they have any merit when you consider the relevant markets and parties involved.