Shot spacing makes sense if you have justifiable reasons for it, reasons that don't include baby trauma.

5 shots at one time is a cost saving measure?

Your justification makes sense but I don't think you can extrapolate your own conscientious approach to the general population.

They certainly don't have a right to endanger the rest of us because they're stupid. It's completely impracticable to separate children without vaccines from the general population. Raising a kid however you see fit does not include consciously putting their lives, and the lives of the community, in serious danger. If…

I meant, why is patriarchy the culprit instead of good old fashioned power relations?

I respect what you're saying, but that's not really the angle I was driving at. I didn't mean to imply that all sex should fall within the limits of my preferences, by any means. I certainly don't support the limitation of consensual activities between adults, up to and including porn.

I totally agree with your sentiment:

Which implies that ostracising someone who doesn't fit the mould isn't an inherently human quality, but a product of the patriarchy?

I think part of the problem isn't just the porn itself (though there's enough there to engender conflict already), but the conditions it's made under - as the article points out. I think a huge part of the issue is the relationship between participant and producer, and the issue of skin for cash. Or maybe that's just…

How do you mean? I always hear this argument but I don't understand it (not wilfully). Maybe it's because of my name?

You make a good point and I don't disagree with you. I appreciate the time you took to respond thoughtfully and in detail.

I don't understand your point here. Why would you need to know a person's history to decide whether what they're saying is something you agree with or not? A piece of work speaks for itself doesn't it?