And remember when 99% of scientists thought that heavier things would fall faster just because of their weight?

Consensus /= right.

You know what bringing in irrelevant examples or false equivalencies is called?

It’s too easy to google.

You don’t seem to understand the definition. It includes the entire information chain, from the field reporters who collect information all the way down to those who dissmenate it to the audience.

You’re correct about the first part, but they’re still journlists by definition of the word. Reporting the news is still journalism:

No, it’s not a “big difference”. It’s the difference between the specific description and the general description. All news anchors are also journalists by definition....kind of like those elementary school logic problems you did where they asked something along the lines of “all dogs are animals, but not all animals…

Why?

Don’t be so Puritan. There’s nothing wrong with a woman celebrating her own sexual power.

I’m sorry I get worked up, but I think it’s considered acceptable to get worked up over cold blooded murder of women.

People can talk shit about Trump all day, but him, Paul, and Sanders are the only major political figures who were against the Iraq war in 2003. If we’d listen to them back then hundreds of thousands…

I’m sorry I get worked up, but I think it’s considered acceptable to get worked up over cold blooded murder of…

Because Trump saying hateful things is just SO much worse than deliberately bombing innocent muslim women in the Middle East.

Get your shit right. Trump’s a racist asshole and i hate him for it but Hillary and Obama have MURDERED my spirit-kin in cold blood, and they did it for years while assholes like you did nothing…

Because Trump saying hateful things is just SO much worse than deliberately bombing innocent muslim women in the…

Holy shit. I will SQUEEE louder than anyone has ever squeed if someone makes a sci-fi zelda.

As if the author had a clue what the “nuclear triad” is before writing this. I’m all for hit pieces on candidates, but gawker’s more like tabloids than journalism.

If you think that’s bad.....this means they’re going to eventually become an aggressive, spacefaring species.

These assholes are gonna be worse than fucking Daleks.

I’m pretty sure that the MRA crowd doesn’t even know this game exists. They’re usually more into ultra-violent or ultra-sexual action games.

The Irony of Kotaku complaining about social media harassment campaigns is not lost on me.

The irony is that the people who backed Dubya hate Trump.

You’re missing the point. He doesn’t half to identify “in full”. He identifies as a socialist, so we should consider him a socialist.

Hey, remember that time when “all reviews and a majority of players” said that Dragon Age 2 was the shit?

It lasted all of two weeks, but I remember that.

The major problem with Ni No Kuni is that the core mechanic, the semi real-time combat, was completely broken as a result of terrible team AI. That and it suffered…

so because your opinion coincides with the majority means you’re right?

I kinda had the opposite impression. The gameplay was even more boring than the old turn-based RPGs if you ask me. Biggest thing that struck me is that I found the narrative and the art style to have a wild dissonance: the story was fairly deep stuff.....but then any impact it might have had goes right out the window…

Am I the only one who thinks Ni No Kuni was horribly overrated? I bought it off word of mouth and found it to be horribly dull even after sticking with it well past the point that most JRPGs get interesting.

I’ve asked a couple people what they love about it so much and they invariably start spouting off about how…