bogsexyjerblumd
dannibalcorpse
bogsexyjerblumd

nah, these days that guy spends too much time on the toilet to get any work done

took a second but bravo

As soon as this hit the twitter machine (but before it was debunked) I started a group chat amongst friends to discuss whether or not you check out that hog. The verdict: OVERWHELMING YES

no one cares

Look, you’re just supporting the exercising of second amendment rights!

I think the answer to your question would be yes *and* no. Agents are going to push for the contracts with the gaudier numbers(dual purpose: potential higher payout for them and also looks like they are good at getting their clients big money) but an agent-negotiated contract can have harder to hit guarantees or a

i believe the correct paraphrasing would be “IS our trolls learning?”

Not sure if you’re really bad at reading comprehension, or just being willfully obtuse, but I’ll humor you.

Get off your high horse there, buddy. It’s disingenuous for you to act like the original comment is an actual attack on someone’s religion as opposed to a critique of those who offer “thoughts & prayers” at a time of tragedy while doing nothing to prevent it in the first place.

Does it make you feel good to defend people who pay lip service to religion while actively pursuing policies that run counter to that religion’s teachings?

look at this sheeple, conveniently ignoring reverse vampires

feeling a strange urge to buy a monorail from you now

I think one thing the MLBPA needs to focus on in the next agreement is the draft pick compensation. It’s fairly obvious that one of the reason guys like Lynn & Moustakas lingered so long is because of the draft pick attached to them, and don’t want to lose an early-round pick for a good-not-great player. They should

Nixon in 72 and Reagan in 84 are two of the largest landslide victories in presidential history, but tell me again how your generation pushed things to the left

you know if you keep dismissing me i only get to see the first sentence of what i’m sure is an oh-so-pithy response in my notifications

it’s funny, they’re trying to take credit for boomers being oh-so-liberal and trying to act like millennials are dumb, yet when i tried to show them the data proving that boomers have definitely leaned more republican going back to the 70s, they first tried to act like i was reading the data wrong, and then just

Gonna try and refute anything I’ve said instead of continuing to dismiss me? Or should I just assume your refusal to acknowledge any of this means I’m right?

not gonna read it but very quick to dismiss it because it might contradict the bullshit you’re putting forward? the famed boomer ethics raise their head again!

perhaps i overestimate your analysis skills, since you think i’m claiming that baby boomers were 36-59 in 1993 and again in 2016. the reference i made to voters 40 and over in the 2008 and 2012 elections were in response to your claims i quoted in my previous post. i then added the paragraph “in fact...” to show that

yeah but showing that people aged 40+ in those elections (so everything from older Gen X, Baby Boomers, “Greatest Generation”, and so on) voted for McCain & Romney over Obama kinda refutes this claim you made: