bobmoo79--disqus
bobmoo79
bobmoo79--disqus

Larry you're wrong. First, the description DID NOT match, which is why it never made it into evidence during the '93 grand juries, nor the 2005 trial. It should be mentioned that Jackson was never charged with ANY crime in 93/94 and both grand juries rejected the case against him. there simply wasn't a strong case to

Jackson is dead. Murray can fabricate any conversations he likes and present them as the truth. During his trial he was caught lying again and again and the judge himself chastised Murray at the end of the trial. There is no reason to think this man is telling the truth now, especially when his agenda has always been

I would think it would be hard for a publisher to justify publishing the book written by a convicted killer, therefore actively allowing him to profit from his crime.

You're correct of course but I read the comment as meaning Murray should still be in jail. MJ was never jailed (rightly so)

Sure you do

You know that's just the Neverland train station and not Jackson's actual house right?

How old was Priscilla when he started "hanging out" with her? Just sayin.

Are you kidding??
You do realise that the Chandler father tried blackmailing Jackson for money before any accusations were made, right? You do realise that Jackson hired a Private Investigator who was able to tap Chandler's phone and recorded him saying that he was going to destroy Jackson if he didn't get what he

Intersting you should mention this.
There was one specific date where Jackson was accused of abusing the boy at Neverland. Jackson just happened to be in Germany on that day, but not only that he was broadcast live on German TV accepting a Bambi award. You can't get much more water tight than that. But you'll still

Shizo, what you say is sorta true BUT you must include the context of the Jackson case.
He was charged with 14 counts and was found not guilty on all of them by unanimous verdict. That's one hell of an indication that he didn't commit a crime. Surely if he was guilty, they would have had the evidence to convict on one

Jackson was not exonerated in the legal sense because he wasn't convicted of a crime!!! You cannot be exonerated if you weren't convicted, so the ONLY outcome Jackson or anybody else in his position could aim for was "not guilty".

Yeah "not guilty" is the best verdict you'll receive if you're ever unlucky enough to be implicated in a crime.
BUT why is it that people feel the need to point out that "not guilty" doesn't equal "innocent". It suggests that for many people being accused of a crime is almost as bad as actually committing the crime.

This is a classic. People who know nothing and don't have the intellect or the knowledge to back up their flawed argument calling those more knowlegable than themselves "insane".
Why should people who are fans of Jackson AND who know all about the case against him be called insane? Is Stephen Hawking insane just

Rockin69 there aren't really any parallels between Saville and Jackson beyond the fact they both donated a lot of time and effort to charitable causes. They both visited hospitals - but so do many, many celebrities. Jonny Depp often goes dressed as Jack Sparrow. Next you'll be saying that's a sign of him being a

JMP you're a tool. Listen to somebody who actually knows what they're talking about rather than rely on the scandolous reports you read in the tabloids where the only agenda is to sell papers, or click-bait stories on tabloidish websites.

Typical, another person who likes to provide misleading quotes. Jackson's bedroom was split on two floors. The kid slept in the bed on the upper floor while Jackson slept on the lower floor. Allowing another person's kid to sleep in your room unsupervised is idiotic but not illegal.
On the other hand allowing your

*watches the tumbleweed slowly drift across the desert*

Creepy perhaps, based on the news you've read in the media. Inappropriate definitely. BUT not illegal. Not criminal. That's the point here. Too many people believe the crap they read without question.

Yes RadarOnline LIED about the evidence found at Neverland. They photoshopped pictures to look incriminating and included them in their report. For example, they took a picture of boys playing in shorts and added a black bar across each of their waist and hop area, covering their shorts and then stated that the boys

There is no doubt that the close bonds that he formed with children were unusual. Allowing other peoples' children to sleep in his bed was inappropriate in my opinion, even though he made it very clear that he slept on the floor. Even though his bed was on a raised mezannine floor and he slept on the ground floor