I’m not saying either is “gross”. One is a loving, consenting, adult relationship between an adult man and an adult woman that spanned 4 years and nearly ended with marriage.....and the other is a female who wants to plow her step brother.
I’m not saying either is “gross”. One is a loving, consenting, adult relationship between an adult man and an adult woman that spanned 4 years and nearly ended with marriage.....and the other is a female who wants to plow her step brother.
LOL, I’m assuming by your IQ level that “Dr” is just a nickname, like Dr Pepper or Dr J right?
LOL, 1? i???? I swear the only people who say 1 are either people without kids or people whose kids are so old they forget how much 1 sucks.
Obsessed? I used his case as a perfect example for the selective moral outrage on this site because this very site just posted an OP condemning Seinfeld him for his relationship a few days ago.
I see, so fantasy books about pedophilia would be cool and popular too right? What’s that? No they wouldn’t because people don’t get turned on by the thought of an adult having sex with a child? Hmmm, so I guess it’s safe to say that the people who buy these step sib romance books like the content, get excited by it.…
Why are females always assuming a young woman has no power? Do you just see young woman as weak victims?
FYI - as far as I can you are the first to say that., and I completely agree. That was my point. The selective moral outrage is unreal.
Trolling has to be the most incorrectly and overused term on the internet. A troll is someone who is posting with the sole purpose of pissing people off. But people like you just attach to anyone who has an opinion or comment you don’t like.
Actually, generally I agree that the same people would also complain about a 40 year old woman with an 18 year old boy, but let’s not pretend the outrage is equal. That being said, my point wasn’t really about the sex (male or female as the older person), my point was about the selective moral outrage over various…
The topic I brought up was the selective moral outage in consenting relationships. LOL, am I supposed to wait for an OP entitled “Gawker’s Selective Outrage”?
1) Of course people can “think” and “say” whatever they want. My point is the social punishment they will soundly receive, namely being viciously attacked and called bigots and haters. We DEMAND they either conform or keep their ignorant views to themselves. We have made “you can’t chose who you love” the foundation…
You don’t fantasize about something that DOESN’T turn you on. The people on the board not having any issue with the novels, and said fantasies, clearly indicates they have no problem with the subject matter.
Yes, I suppose that’s true.
LOL, yeah probably why i said they “MAY BE” blood related.
“Looking back, i’m obviously glad nothing happened when I was a horny dipshit teenager”
Example?
The question I posed, the point I made, is perfectly legit. Which is why you are attacking me - you can’t come up with an effective counter on the subject.
All I need was make a comment about the selective moral outrage that exists when I noticed that it’s apparently cool for a female to want to bang her step brother.
No, they didn’t start dating until she was 18. I’m open to any proof you can provide otherwise.
You don’t “fantasize” about something unless it turns you on. So obviously the readers and many here have no issue with step siblings fucking.