It looks pretty bad to complain about lack of coverage of what you’re claiming is an important endorsement if you don’t even know whether the person is male or female. Lol.

Sanders had to comment on it because it became a media meme (which I’m sure has nothing to do with the Clinton campaigns aggressive handling of their media assets). When he didn’t say anything the accusations were about his complicity by silence, but when he does address it it proves that it’s real? That’s quite a…

I didn’t say that nobody is sexist anywhere - of course there are shitty people all over. But that’s a far cry from seeing a lot of explicit calls for men to support men by Sanders supporters, which was the claim.

I’m not sure I follow. Someone blatantly makes something up, and when called out about it the point is ‘actually’ a condescending assumption that I’m ignorant of other people’s experiences?

You have a very manipulative writing style, it’s impressive. I mean you lie, but it’s impressive.

I didn’t say anything about Hillary, I said YOU made that up. If liar is the term you want to use, that’s fine, yes, you’re lying.

“But Bernie, bro, a lot of your followers are explicitly saying just that”

Well you can call him that now if you really want to, no need to wait for things to stay the same.

Do you actually believe that people want to see the transcripts of the speeches due to misogyny?

But again, this all operates on your completely made-up premise of “Bernie is a blind idealist who can’t get anything done.”

So it’s just a matter of being granted approval as an exception by the gov’t?