How does the staff of Deadspin jibe their love of Conor with their disdain for every other racist troll on the planet?

More significantly, so does John Lewis.

I now believe she did masterbate him back to health because just like the act it was great in the moment, but then things regressed pretty quickly after the fact.

You’d think a guy that spent time defending one of our allies from a country where they will literally kill you for not being patriotic enough would admire the liberties we have in this country which he himself defended. I guess that’s asking too much for some people.

“They won’t take the risk to exhibit their free speech in a way that places their circumstance in jeopardy, so let them get out of uniform and do their protesting on somebody else’s nickel,” he said.

If Brad Pitt wants the public to ignore his divorce he should have Terrence Malick direct it.

People who still believe Tiger has a major or two left in him are seriously deluded.

That’s pretty amazing coming from a guy who had a very public, very nasty divorce due to adultery while he was mayor of New York City. The gall of these men...

At least Hillary Clinton wasn’t stupid enough to put the New York City Office of Emergency Management into the World Trade Center against the recommendation of the FBI.

After last night, I literally cannot wrap my mind around the idea that any sane person would think he is qualified to serve as president. He’s the worst sort of thin-skinned, narcissistic, no-nothing bully.

Damn. This is a college kid. We’re in good shape.

Lucky? Last night was comedy gold, Jerry! GOLD!

Real hunters go after the elephant in the room.

But remember, none of this is Hinkie’s fault! Not the fact he drafted all these redundant bigs or that he overestimated their trade value or that he never signed a point guard who could credibly get a team into an offense. Nope, not his fault. You just didn’t have the patience for the genius gambit that would’ve…

If one candidate says X is true and the other one says X is false, it’s the moderator’s job to say what the objectively verifiable facts are, when readily available. Otherwise, they’re letting one get away with a lying to the people who don’t know the difference, and that’s failing the audience.

TRUMP!!!

This is an important point. The Republican Party and conservatives have been laying the groundwork for media acceptance of Trump lies for a very long time.

I find it pretty funny that people can participate in a discussion about the place of “fact-checking” in a presidential debate without reflecting on the individual who has singlehandedly made the discussion necessary.

Although it’s also almost like the average person has decided to become stupid and lazy enough to not care/bother with using their brain to sort out actual facts. Hard to say.

It’s almost like the people in charge have deliberately made it harder for an average person to sort out what the actual truth is so their crafted stories will have that much of an easier path to becoming the definitive consensus. It’s almost like they’ve realized that the harder it is for a normal person to find…