bmpof
BM - The President of Fuckery
bmpof

well, that seals it.

You, my friend, are not that good at this.

We get it, you don’t think pressuring women to do sexual things is any big deal.

Not only that, but has filmed countless scenes of ripening-with-promise young girls being totally and creepily involved in their fathers’ romantic lives with adult partners, and displaying it as a loving act between father and daughter.

The logic would be that there could be other children that Woody Molested and they just don’t have a platform.

Because a man,especially a rich one, matters more than anyone else.

Stephens is practicing lazy journalism. Yesterday he tweeted that if Allen was guilty the judge presiding over the case could have found Allen guilty. The only problem is that this wasn’t a criminal case and Allen was not being tried on his guilt or innocence. The Judge did find that the allegations were credible.

That seems to be a constant thread through all these “let’s not be too hasty” articles in that he only has once accuser. Plenty of those found under #MeToo only had one very vocal accuser in cases but no one cared then but so many people, a surprisingly large amount of women in particular, seem to want to defend Woody

I just don’t know why people are still carrying water for this scumbag.

We are talking about a man who has been OPEN about being into underage girls since...well, since at least Manhattan. I don’t get the confusion?

This article, from 2014, does an excellent job of breaking down the way the coverage of the case has bent over backward to claim inconsistencies in Dylan’s story while completely ignoring all the inconsistencies and flat-out lies in Woody’s: http://www.lililoofbourow.com/?p=114

Comparing the UVA debacle to Woody Allen is ridiculous. They are in no way the same. And using the UVA story to discredit Dylan Farrow is wrong. But the media, it’s about the media! How the two have been handled in the media is also not even remotely the same. Or are you and the writer conveniently forgetting how his

Why in the fuck does there need to be more than one accuser?!

I’ve seen some commenters here say that the fact that Woody “only” molested one child is somehow enough evidence that he didn’t even do that. I think this is Law and Order: SUV’s fault. Somehow we all now believe we are experts on child molesters and their behavior and we just KNOW that there MUST be more because NO

Especially since so little is known about Nefertiti in the first place - but the bust created of her in 1335 BC looks a fair bit like the rendering shown in the article (it also doesn’t look, frankly, that ‘white’).

WTF. How about you read the fvcking article from the Guardian in full, do your Googles and call Wikipedia too, while you’re at it? Earliest humans originated in Africa and migrated to other continents, where adaptation resulted in physical changes like white skin. And BTW, as shown in various African

This is completely wrong on multiple counts.

I don’t know if this is one of those things that was suspected in academic circles but didn’t filter out, but I’m not surprised by this at all. Paleolithic hunter gatherers ranged and depending on diet and other things the pressure for paler skin could have been fairly mild. Neolithic farmers brought a significant

There have been far too many invasions of Britain by foreign adversaries. So, starting now, DNA testing should be mandatory and anyone with a hint of Roman, Saxon, Angle or Jute DNA should immediately be sent home to Europe. Everybody else can stay.

It drives racists crazy when you try to remind them that dark skin and an African heritage is a trait shared among all humans at some point in our genetic history. It doesn’t matter that Cheddar Man’s race was technically one that no longer exists.