bmkui1uxar
BMkUi1uxaR tjNKE6dTor
bmkui1uxar

How would you even structure such a law? Unless the US has a mass of worthless unions (possible) any job is going to be an individual wage. For it to work, she'd need to be able to prove she got passed over for a raise/ promotion simply because of her gender rather than because the guy was better at ass kissing.

Where did I ever say full? I said greater, and she bears the greater responsibility for the same reason it's a damn good idea for you to make sure there's been a home inspection performed when you buy a house, and why you then turn around and buy homeowners insurance once it's yours. We can apply social structures to

The fact that RISUG is not available has nothing to do with with institutionalized misogyny and everything to do with the issues inherent with releasing untested drugs or treatment, especially when we do not understand the mechanism of action to the public. See thalidomide for the most famous example. It's currently

You are an idiot. Both parties bear responsibility because duh. However unless you intend to argue that the woman does not bear the greater cost of pregnancy she has the greater responsibility. Greater Cost+Greater Risk=Greater responsibility. If she somehow doesn't have access to birth control, she ultimately has the

Placing the onus for birth control on women is entirely sensible, if not fair. Blame biology for that.

Think the 16% figure is new, though it's less scary than it seems even if it's accurate.

Would it be fair for a republican working a newsstand to refuse to handle a left leaning newspaper because of political discrimination? Take magazines catering to the gay community out of sight because a christian fundamentalist might see it and be offended? Segregate the spanish language papers because some hick is

Not really. Rights go both ways, for better or worse. If stores are allowed to carry publication A which makes person A uncomfortable, then absent some other compelling reason, you can't stop them from carrying publication B which makes person B uncomfortable. The respective journalistic, artistic or any other istic

Doesn't really work that way. You don't get to claim it's discriminatory to need to see/handle a "lads mag" any more then you can claim political discrimination because you need to handle a newspaper that's biased for a viewpoint you don't like, religious discrimination because you need to handle a magazine catering

Problem is women generally want nothing to do with "Domestic Gods." unless they can get it coupled with "Very Successful." whereas most guys don't give much of a damn what a women does/earns provided she's not an utter burden and fairly attractive. I'm too lazy to hunt down studies to write a mini essay you don't want

Her waist hasn't changed much if at all, it just looks like it because one picture is a front view while the other isn't. Her eyes are actually smaller, you just can't see as much of the side of her head. Hair is... flooflier? and the dress is a little lower cut but not a major issue.

No I get your point. Still disagreeing with it.

Misdemeanor sex crimes are things like indecent exposure, "unnatural and lascivious acts" (Read: Sodomy (Read: Pretty well every sexualy active person in the world)) solicitation, public urination etc. Depending on how backwards Iowa's laws currently are that could also include transvestitism, ownership of sex toys

No, I get the point, I'm disagreeing with it.

From the utter lack of anything vaguely sexual in the marketing, this is exactly as misogynistic (or just offensive) as you want/allow it to be, and frankly if we want to go OH MY GOD SOMEONE IMPLIED WOMEN HAVE BOOBS!=bad, we may as well pack it in and turn everything over to the MRAs, because the equality fight is

Can't say I've ever bothered to check/ask, but at a guess there's not huge amounts of loose blood when dealing with a tampon and etc seeing as that's kinda the point. All you need to handle that safely is a pair of gloves, especially since people are hopefully putting them in the garbage bin.

That's just a... well not a habit, but a routine thing. Your used to going to bed at X time and waking up at Y time and your body reeeeally doesn't like to change that kinda thing. Drag most "Morning People" out of bed an hour or two before normal and they tend to be even more zombieish than you!

Basically this. The article can be summed up as "HEY LOOK SOME CAT BREEDERS ARE TERRIBLE HUMAN BEINGS!" to which is not exactly news.

It's a hand size issue, namely hers are probably a fair bit smaller. Makes it real easy to get an uncomfortable grip and a firm grip on a guy and on a women are just different enough. If you don't pay attention (Or are used to playing the usual bullshit dominice games and don't alter that shit) you'll hurt her pretty

Penis size has apparently been slowly increasing over the last couple thousand years, and it sure hasn't been the men selecting for it. *shrug*