blurgie
blurgie
blurgie

Lower arches are generally stronger than higher arches, but in ballet, the aesthetics trump all. Irish dance is so different- both the hard and soft shoes help define the look of an arch already. Also the commonly desired Irish dance point holds the foot so much straighter than in ballet, where the "best" pointed feet

Wow. Your story makes me very sad that you were told so much nonsense and that it kept you from ballet. I have awful feet, but I've been lucky enough to enjoy a lifetime of dancing (and hell yes, men's class jumping, thank you booty power) for my own personal betterment. Of course, I'm no professional, but I still

Hello classmate :o) I graduated that year too! My favorite part of that whole gradutirement debacle was the "parties" he held in the dorms just before commencement, passing out items with his face all over them. I still have a couple of the SJT temporary tattoos; I think I kept them because no one would believe me

Fully agreed, as a dark chocolate snob, and when I realized it's made with palm oil I wrote it out of my life entirely.

I had something like the initial instance occur when working as a cashier in a convenience store. I had accidentally accepted one or two counterfeit twenties, and alerted my manager when I fully realized. She told me to try to get rid of them as change. I opted to keep them in my drawer and throw them in the safe when

I've been buying Men's Mitchum for years, and at the stores I buy at, it is absolutely at least $1.50 less, and the men's stick is a bit larger than the ladies'. What a racket.

My mom is the same way. As soon as she sees whatever pre-planned tricks or bs papers they're going to show her, she just says "I know this is bs. Please give me the figures for what I want, no other persuasion necessary." I think it's hilarious.

I JUST bought my first car and picked it up yesterday. It was just me doing it. I told them this was not my first car purchase. It was ok, I had my research done and got what I wanted out of the car that I was considering (found it on cars.com). They did get me on one thing, though: they offered me a wraparound

Was dating a guy for a little while, and was over at his house one weekday afternoon. I was looking at the pictures on his fridge (he was an older guy with lots of family all over the country), and I asked if so-and-so was his niece, nephew, or whatever other family member he had described to me, and then got to a

I have a tattoo on the back of my knee, and the needling over the tendons back there made my leg jump SO MUCH that the artist had clamp down on my leg with another shop employee holding my foot down. Luckily this method resulted in no errors, but I felt bad to chain these guys to my leg to hold back my reflexes. Ouch

Actually, there is a significant mixup happening here when comparing cutoffs from other organizations: namely, that there are two major steps to confirming a positive drug test, and the cutoffs for each test are different owing to the differing accuracy of the two different tests. The initial screen limit is 50 ng/ml.

My source is having worked in a drug testing lab and doing the marijuana metabolite testing myself. It sticks around stably just fine at RT for several days (though it is of course frozen); it's an organic compound but not a protein like FGF. Its stability is more akin to, say, steroid hormones in solution. I don't

I used to work for Quest. I think it's getting mixed up by the fact that there is first an immunoassay screen, which is kind of like a semiquantitative assay. It gives you a ballpark figure but it's fairly imprecise, and the cutoff for the screen you link to is 50 ng/mL to send to confirmations. The confirmation test

That's pretty low. I used to see 5 ng/ml as a standard cutoff for medical professionals getting on-the-job testing.

I also worked at a drug testing facility in the confirmations area, and never saw a limit above 15 ng/mL. 15 was typical, 5 was sometimes the case for certain clients, and LOD was the absolute lowest I ever saw. I wonder if there is a difference in standards by geographical location or just by independent company.

Marijuana metabolite stored in a urine sample will not break down in a few days (or hours, as was likely the time period between these two testings). Especially when frozen, as is standard policy in such labs. The difference is due to two separate extractions, and two separate instrument calibrations (for analysis by

No, the standard pre-employment screen/on-the-job test cutoff is 15 ng/mL. Lower for medical professionals. I've never seen a cutoff higher than 15 in my time working at a drug testing lab.

The difference is miniscule. The same sample from the same bottle can easily quant at those varied concentrations, could even quant a bit more widely and still be valid. The variation can come from any step along the line from drug extraction to instrument calibration on the mass spec. In my time working at a drug

The typical pre-employment screening cutoff in the US is 15 ng/ml for marijuana. This is also true of on-the-job testing and most law enforcement cutoffs.

Urk. Dude I was super duper into was going down on me in his bedroom, and anytime he took a moment for air he spent some time telling me all about his ex-girlfriend he was trying to get back together with. He told me how he had fucked things up with her and would do anything he could to make it right. Her framed