I think having specs and a year take something away from the name. You know, less is more, and all that.

So I'm with everybody else that's in the mindset of doing away with credit entirely. It's a broken system that is extremely lopsided and benefits the lenders exponentially moreso than it does the borrowers. It's time to go all Fight Club on it.

I agree... a flat surface, a single laptop, and a handful of decorations does not a 'work'space make.

"naieve"

I'm not sure I said they were. I was talking about the first one on the list, that brought in a hundred mil.

To be fair, not all lots are BHPH. I don't know anything about this particular one though, but typically the ones that are have a whole lot more spitshine than what this guy had. His lot just looked like a old dirty corner lot with vehicles up to five or seven grand.

That's pretty basic emergency medicine stuff right there though. Any type of head, neck or back injury would include those things. Whether it was a sports injury, car accident, or even a misstep leading to a fall on the sidewalk.

I guess that's the 'modern' metric... if people download it and then aren't willing to pay for it afterwards, then you can consider the movie a failure. Although, I'd gladly produce multiple failures if they brought in a hundred mil each.

I dunno... there are a lot of people out there where are smarter than me. I'm just saying that taxing gas is the problem, since not all cars use gas equally.

So you're Hank Hill but instead of propane you do chrome and chrome accessories?

This is reasonable, but only in the sense that it's using 1980's logic to solve 2020 problems. The actual problem is with how the state uses a gas tax to fund highway construction and maintenance. Now with cars leaving the internal combustion realm, the elected officials can't keep up. Instead of forcing an…

Psst. He's a Kentucky fan. Let him have his moment.

My problem was with your use of the word 'never'. As in: 'once they have five losing seasons in a row then the program can never ever have a winning season again.'

meh... gizmodo had a fairly useless commenting system 5 years ago.

So your argument is that simply uploading a photo to Instagram functions the same as when a professional signs a contract and is paid for the use of the pictures?

Them having the approval/acceptance language in the TOS doesn't necessarily mean that you know when your images are out there being used by someone else. That's the 'notification' that they're not providing.

You know, for whatever it's worth, I grew up playing video games but I never once tried to go down a giant green pipe in real life. I did step on a few mushrooms, and punch a few bricks with my head, you know, just in case.

The old 'if you're not paying for the product then YOU'RE the product being sold' adage is so overused these days. Even if it's factually correct, it's a straw man argument in this scenario.

If you don't mind me being serious for a minute. (Yes, I'm aware this is Deadspin, so my apologies in advance.)

You're still missing it. That ruling protects "even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate."