Uhhh....aside from that being a really weird comeback...like seriously is that your idea of an insult? But it also seems you dont understand what “self-actualization” means. If you look at Maslow’s hierarchy, its hard to see how someone so upset about being charged money for their imaginary doll clothing could have…

“God help me if I’m ever so sad that I refer to an internet comment as a ‘beating.’” Hahaha ohh dont worry you soared past that point of sadness when you became sooo upset from getting served online that you came back multiple days later to link an article, an incredibly weak one at that. But dont worry, you are sad…

hahahaha Belgium!? You come back to the site of your beating to cite a BELGIAN “investigation”!? hahahahahahahah hold on .....hold on... need to catch my breath......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

How dare you call my masturbation unsubstantiated!!! If I can’t masturbate to manipulating another Kotaku commenter into agreeing with the argument he had been arguing against for days, what CAN I masturbate to!?

“Are you really that proud of an internet conversation that you would show that off to your “friends”?” Ohhh its certainly not pride. Its more laughable pity at the hysterics over mircotransactions, which we’ve been laughing at for months.

Hahaha says the guy that just agreed with the entire argument hes been fighting for days now haha. Dont worry im gonna print this guy out and show it to some of the other associates here. Luckily my firms got some other gamers here and we love laughing at you stupid uneducated man-children like you. Nice Mom’s…

OMG you just agreed with my entire argument! “X is Y and if you disagree with me you’re child worried about dolls clothing (A physical object with tangible value and resellability something that digital content lacks destroying your analogy)“ ——> That IS WHY ITS NOT GAMBLING YOU UTTER FUCKING MONGOLOID. It confirms my…

hahaha omg, I’m apparently a dipshit and dont know how things work.........and then you proceed to send me some video of a youtuber!?!?! hahahahahah holy shit. I assume state gambling statutes were a little too hard to read? haha wow. Hey Kid! GROW. THE. FUCK. UP.

“All you did was explain the legal and fiscal realities of the situation, which make me upset to seriously consider, which is therefore classic trolling.”

hahah gotta love getting called stupid by someone after they throw out a gem like “Doesn’t know shit about shit.” hahah come on man, Words, Use ‘Em!

hahah ohhh yaa suuuuuure its kinja’s fault.

Re-read that last paragraph you wrote out loud and then end it by saying “By selling randomized imaginary doll clothing” and try not to feel incredibly silly.

I genuinely LOL’d when i got in and saw you respond two more times after this haha. “Not wasting a second further on you.” This may be illustrative of the problem. I believe words have meanings while you clearly do not.

Nah just because forgoing short term profits for some other benefit doesnt erase the fact that it exists to make money (and shield from liability of course).

hahah oh nooo, guess ill have to tell my girlfriend to sell the apartment if I’m supposed to be living with my parents. I guess I should return my law degree and quit my firm too???

Ya, its just a vague “i don’t like capitalism” spew from another game blogger. I mean, these arn’t Harvard law grads working in this space, so its never surprising.

Yep, if you dont see random doll clothing boxes as “economic violence” (seriously that never stops being funny) then I guess your just a “pedant” haha

And who do you work for!? Ricky is a preeeeetty suspicious name.

“This is a poor argument” —> tell that to the Court that made it. Sorry.  

haha how it is even slightly exploitative? Please explain to me how offering randomized imaginary doll clothes is exploiting you? Try to explain this without feeling embarrassed.