blessyerheart
blessyerheart
blessyerheart

I’d agree with all of your points but for the fact that I don’t think Kim could be bothered to make the effort it would take to be a sex worker. She made a sex tape with a guy like any girl could have made with any guy from what I’ve heard about it. Then she put so little effort into that fake marriage that it fell

I don’t understand the hate towards her for the sex work. I can understand hating her vapidity, fetishizing black men and the awful behavior of her sisters. But the insult always comes back to being a ho,which is sexist and stupid to criticize. We may not use our bodies but most of us have whored ourselves out in

Yep. She is exactly like Kris Jenner, from the managing the husband/kids to the addiction to plastic surgery. It is hilarious that she of all people is badmouthing the Kardashians.

I can’t help but wonder if it’s about jealously more than anything else. Because KUWTK took the basic formula that the The Osbournes pioneered (AFAICT), ran with it, and made orders of magnitude more money than they ever did. And there were rumors a couple of years ago that Sharon wanted to try and revive the show.

It’s not as if Osbourne has ever been an outspoken feminist herself, so WTF. If she just wanted to slag off the Kardashians, why bother? They thrive on the attention.

Before they got into a bitter divorce, the parents of a 5 year old had agreed, at the mother’s insistence, that he not be allowed to play video games before the age of 10.

You know, I have zero expectations that Trump’s deal with the Democrats is “the beginning of a new, more presidential Trump” or whatever the hell the press says every time he doesn’t completely shit the bed.

Pretty much. If it needs changed/fixed, “the market” will do it because “the market” is super smart or something. Ayn Rand said so!

Here’s a thought. Get behind early sex education, free and abundant birth control, and plenty of low cost child care.

Here’s real courage and generosity. They’re going to get slammed for this, but they’re doing it anyway because it’s right.

I don’t want to sound pro-Trump or anti-EPA in any way; the opposite is true. Emphatically. In fact, the damage to the environment us my main heartache with this administration.

A child’s job is to attend school. They will not have access to school lunches if they do not fulfill their obligations and attend school.

They. Are. Children. What the fuck are they supposed to do, have empty bellies and possibly get bad grades because their minds are on that instead of their schoolwork? And who the fuck says that getting free meals via the government for the rest of their lives will be their takeaway? Awfully presumptuous.

I mean, feel free to explain to little Janie all about your Randian jerkoff fantasy and how her mother is a leech on the system but Janie is eight and she’s hungry and she doesn’t understand why adults who have food won’t give her food when she’s hungry.

That’s totally how I felt about Girls. But for some reason, I’m down with this show.

You know what would make a good shew? About a group of sister company bloggers who have to compete against each other in the same content space: media & entertainment. It’s an in-depth look at being young(ish) and getting paid(ish) to work on the internet and live in New York. But not everything is peaches and cream

Am I crazy or is magazine employee like the #1 job for women in TV shows and movies?

I posted this on VSB but it needs to be read here:

Susan Kelechi Watson is one of the best actresses you’ve never think about but when you see her you’re like “oh, she’s cool”.

Thank you. Strong black male lead that doesn’t chew up scenery & plays an important role in the main character’s development. A strong intelligent independent female lead that can carry a storyline & a young black male that blends in & has been featured as an important part of the story arc. Shows on the CW should be