OP: “Sounds like [X].”

Umm... the OP ordered a medium-rare steak. They said what they would get was “overcooked,” not “medium” (or even “a bit overcooked”).

Everyone has their own “standards.” If the OP is fine with that particular restaurant (which it sounds like they are), why tell them to go somewhere else? Sounds to me like they’ve figured out how to time their dining out experience exactly how they want it - I wish I could have that level of control at the…

Yeah, not sure why anyone would think you should just eat (and pay for) something you didn't order...

What stereotype - that kitchen workers are hyper-sensitive?

How does the reason they only ate some of it make the OP's statement untrue?

True the server should ask if they still want the dish in such a scenario, but if that doesn’t happen then the customer should tell them they no longer want it rather than accept it (and in this case, seemingly eat some of it).

Why? 

“I ended up packing away almost the whole side since I’d stolen bites from my neighbors in addition to my main dish.

“My personal preference...”

“I very much understand that other people live under differing circumstances than mine.”

So... you don’t understand that not everyone lives the same exact life and has the same exact resources and preferences as you?

You can’t understand why people may want to make use of delivery services? Seriously?

“the app does not provide the delivery service if the restaurant on the app does not provide delivery service.”

“the apps are claiming that the customers can receive deliveries from restaurants that do not fulfill take out or delivery service.”

...And?

Nobody’s asking you to get hung up on it - you are free to ignore such comments. The OP had a valid question and point; the headline makes a claim that is not supported by the article. And it’s not simply an “editing detail” - it’s a false claim.

The OP is responding to the claim made in the headline (which hey quoted in their initial comment), which is not supported by the article; the writer provides no examples of restaurants being forced to use these business’s services.

The article doesn’t provide any examples of these companies forcing restaurants to use their services, as is claimed in the headline.

Yeah, this article describes customers using the services - there is no example of any restaurant using the service (forced or otherwise).