How so? Give me an example.

“Well sorry to break it to you, buddy, but we can know because we aren’t fucking stupid.”

How is that related?

Please explain my definition of exists versus others.

I don’t care if I convince you.

All the more reason it’s a better argument. She should assume she knows absolutely everything. Doctors usually choose their words carefully.

It is not necessarily false, but her second statement is more accurate.

And again... That you know of.

Your issue is that you”infer” all kinds of things. You are hoping to argue about climate change but that’s just not the issue.

Alright one more. You sucked me in. A more accurate comparison is if someone said “A book had never been written about the mating habits of Bigfoot”. I doubt that book exists, but there would be nothing wrong with adding “that I’m aware of”.

The two have have nothing in common. The system only allows one president. There could be millions of studies and how many have you read?

Wrong. It’s exactly what I have been saying. You wanted to argue something else just to argue. Grow up buddy. Have a good night.

So if you are not aware of it, then it doesn’t exist? The only fact is you don’t know but you believe there is no evidence. As do I.

Commentors and their google search know all...

Again, that you are aware of. There is nothing wrong with phrasing it in the most accurate way. It’s just not a big deal.

You also don’t know if there has ever been a study, accurate or not, that said so.

No I’m not. I have said several times now that they do not. People are just going to argue that.

I don’t think that was for me. In any case, there is nothing wrong with acknowledging that there might be something somewhere that you do not know. Of course that wouldn’t happen in a comments section.

She said it in the appropriate way. It’s really not a big deal.

I agree. Apparently so does she.