blah8
Blah8
blah8

Awww, I was hoping he'd draw more in the style of his original version.

Now they should switch and see which one comes out on top again...

Another way to think of it is that there is one World Chess Championship that is open to all genders. Then, separately, there is a women-only championship that women have the option to compete in as well.

No way!

Nonetheless, it's still technically correct to label the PS4, XO, and Wii U as current-generation consoles, as they have each released fully into the market — more than six months ago, no less. However, to avoid confusion amongst those who may not see this technicality, I've sometimes heard "new-generation" used

Yeah, I have an older version of Android and Google Maps on my phone and none of the buttons or options Google mentioned showed up, despite following their directions. I was pretty disappointed, especially when they announced the business cards.

Knowing you, Bob, that should've been a GIF where the only major animation is a tear running down his face.

Networkqatsi

Okay, now that they have Pac-Man, they need the guy with the Pac-Man logo on his hat: Klonoa!

*breathing sounds*

Ah, you're right on both counts. I should've caught that.

The questions that need to be answered are:

The editing was pretty straight forward. It was the smaller bits of the camera's exposure and focus that were off. Most shots were slightly over or under exposed, and a few were even out of focus.

Oh, really? That's cool — from what I've heard it should be a nice competitor to offerings from Sony and Red.

Slimy Lard Dung. I've heard it has a similar psychological effects to something called lysergic acid diethylamide.

So, before reading the rest of the article, I'm seeing here a person in a large peacock-like jacket or dress have a sudden convulsion with a limb of some sort on their right side as they walk toward... I'm not sure, is that a large tree? I wish this header image was better lit so I could actually see what is going on..

I could see that happening if the initial image was noisy or very distorted and was then re-compressed at a variable bitrate. On the other hand, even very clean images can have their file sizes bumped up if they're compressed to higher bitrates.

"Lossless" is a specific term relating to compression, or lack thereof, of a file in such a way as to be able to, entirely and without any data loss, recreate the originally uncompressed file from the compressed version. Quality loss in general is subjective, as various intensities of even the same codec (JPEG for

It actually runs at 30 FPS though, not 23.976. Also 23.976 is really only used in for easier television signal compatibility. If one were to shoot a movie with regular film, it would still be a solid 24.0 FPS. </nitpicking>