blah8
Blah8
blah8

Yeah, 25 FPS is just for the PAL version; the NTSC version does 24 FPS.

Welcome to fandom on the internet.

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, then.

Okay, well, I thought I was responding to someone with this... I guess not?

Yeah, they're standard operating procedure for testing the resolution of cameras, though the modern test charts are much more complex.

It also doesn't help that it was made by a website clearly trying to discredit the PS3 in favor of the 360 and Wii, as indicated at the end of the video.

It'd be Sutoriito for Street. There's no "tu" in traditional Japanese syllables.

I'm more confused as to why you picked the Z10 over the Nexus 4 in that test. The Z10 image has such a massive amount of flaring and such an apparent lack of dynamic range, that detail is lost tremendously in both the highs and lows. The sun is nothing more than a massive bright blob taking up a chunk of the sky. At

It would be kind of ironic, but wouldn't you be able to recover the file from Dropbox itself via the stated 30-day deleted file recovery function? Then, you'd just sync again to download the file to your computer.

It's an MMO without the first "M."

My main reason for wanting works like Proteus to be categorized differently than games has to do with them not containing certain elements considered to be essential qualifiers for the term (it doesn't have the qualities of a game/meet the definition, etc.). Those qualifiers would be the game including some form of

Obviously, these developers didn't listen to Gabe Newell...

Well, my point would be that there are both creative and mechanical differences between general works of interactive expression and the more specific category of games. If we were debating over the merits of a certain quality of Proteus, over its genre, its emotional impact, or its effectiveness in conveying what the

Range in one thing, but average is another; the average score between these six is 53.3.

Fair enough — if you don't think there's any particular narrative at play (so to speak...) in the work, then I'd maybe label it a work of "interactive expression."

Yes, actually.

You can't think of a better definition than one that is comprised of only two very general words? Really?

No, or I obviously would've have called it that.

We're talking about the work itself, as it's presented, in an objective manner - it's the only way to actually be able to accurately categorize it.

Exactly, thank you.