Most Paparazzi are, as I understand it, freelance.

In this case when you say "stalker", you mean paparazzo? 

The real issue is the modern corporate focus on short term profits over EVERYTHING, no matter how it shoots you in the foot. It’s technically true that any nigh any business model could in theory work, but if you burn out your people and shovel the same shit you just can't be surprised that it's unsustainable. 

I am never going to use biometrics.

So does this mean they'll be able to start selling the dang game again?

Will this include sunscreen? 

So you have no response then.

What the actual fuck? You’re accusing me of discussing in bad faith? Based on *what*, the fact that you don’t have a reasonable response?

People really are just terrible. 

Yawn....so just going to completely have no response but pretend you did one, then? K. Nobody’s going to take that seriously, but if that’s how you salvage your fragile, fragile ego, I suppose I can’t stop you!

Once it’s tweeted out, it’s fully publicly available. That’s a false equivalence.

It’s semi-private, though, don’t you think? That’s why the Giz group, for example, has the “tips@” email addresses, rather thing giving out all the direct emails to particular writers. It’s true that journalists give out direct contact info to anyone they actually want a response from and/or want to be a source, but…

#alldiseasesmatter

But it literally isn’t a bad objection to your point.

You’ve done this numerous times in this thread, so if we’re really going to parse words, then you can see that I didn’t call you a millennial. More importantly, it was just a quip, because you don’t seem to want to bring much levity to the discourse.

That’s not “cherry picking”.

For someone who seems to think that their arguments are unbiased and free from fallacy, it’s fairly ridiculous for you to attribute your personal economics to everyone here, not even including that you think someone needs “infinte” time and money to support multiple artists.

No, I’m not equating Margaret Atwood to CK

There’s levels of assholery of course. Surely you aren’t equating Margaret Atwood’s behavior with CK’s?

Try reading, it would help.