bladerunner060
DoctorMoonSmash
bladerunner060

You’re already in the blacks, so I won’t be bringing you out of them to reply. Though I’m normally in the greys, I have no interest in elevating the troll/dishonest responses, so I guess you’re the one I’m going to respond to.

He “deserves to make a living”, Che? Well, he already made plenty of money, so...fuck right off. He made plenty of living. And nobody is recommending that McDonald’s not hire him. They’re just saying hey, maybe he doesn’t need--or deserve-- to be a famous fucking comedian getting millions of dollars of support. 

My biggest problem is my giant flat feet. I killed my Birkenstocks in like a year and can't justify getting another pair. 

I mean, that’s a fair point vis-a-vis the people who defend even after the evidence is leaked, but overall, letters defending abusers on nebulous “I haven’t seen the evidence but I know they’re innocent” grounds should always be condemned, and are always the same, so I don’t really see why it’s worth pointing out; you

Not to be pedantic and I think we agree completely, but wouldn’t that situation also be a subordinate? Just not a direct subordinate. 

There’s nothing maternal about what she was saying. And, just to be clear, he says:

How is that different than any other shitty defense-of-abuser letter?

Don’t. Fuck. Or. Try. To. Fuck. Subordinates.

I don’t think telling her to move her racist ass is ableist. Telling her to move because she gets anxious-to-the-point-of-not-functioning around people is (arguably) ableist (I mean...is telling people with pacemakers to not stand next to microwaves ableist? At a certain point, it’s a brute fact), but I fell like that

Paramedics rushed to a local hospital and performed surgery.

Hoo, boy, I know the comments here are going to be a shitshow. And I’m not going to defend these medics.

So.... the settlements should be "whatever you fucking want", right?

So you’re 100% sure, so therefore they don’t get to make their own choice. You still don’t see that as incredibly patronizing and dishonest?

That is a shockingly good metric. 

You’d still be depriving her of the choice, and that’s rather the problem. “Oh, I was sure of what you’d do, so therefore I made the choice for you” is patronizing as fuck, especially when it’s about something big like “whether the relationship should continue”.

The deputy said someone called and reported Bynum appearing to spend a long time at houses in the area and appearing to be casing the neighborhood while on her phone.

Yeah, your anecdotal limited experience totes overwhelms my over-a-decade in EMS (eyeroll).

I didn’t miss your point, I disagreed with it by pointing something out.

She was going around the back door of the houses?

Fair enough, but the point is the kind of call you make.