Oh, B.S. “We are at an impasse”, he said, as though what his previous response was wasn’t incredibly rude and dickish. We are not at an impasse—you got upset at something, and you want to pretend that “I’m just going to shake my head and leave you to it because I can’t really deal with the level of misunderstanding…

You’re the one who referred me to your “novel” upthread, so please, don’t act as though I’m antagonizing you. I’ve been nothing but polite—specifically because I didn’t want to anger you. But I can only control that so far, at a certain point, it really is on you.

“The persecution of criminal death relies heavily on motive and intent. The act isn’t really in dispute (unless some shocking evidence comes to light). She wrote texts urging him to take his own life.”

I read it. Unfortunately, I think it suffers from some misunderstandings of how the law works, and I disagree with it inasmuch as it touches on ethics. Being mentally ill does not excuse one from the consequences of one’s actions (though it may factor into appeals for clemency or mercy). Similarly, the state doesn’t…

Getting causation and consequence is sufficient to prevent an insanity defense as a general rule, which I think is the point here: she’s crazy/ill, but not to the point of being an *excuse*.

While true, those more nuanced cases become little different than any crime. OF COURSE people justify it to themselves. That they do so is irrelevant. The only time it’s an excuse is when they can’t understand, and she very clearly understood.

That’s not true at all!

Once again you demonstrate confusion. I didn’t say anything false, Angela-you’ve lied, and have offered no defense except to deny that you’ve lied (which isn’t a defense to the arguments demonstrating you being a liar) In contrast, whenever you’ve tried to make an argument about me saying anything false that’s beyond…

No, Angela. You are dishonest and idiotic—I once again note that I hope you’re merely trolling. At no point have you made any points that were valuable, because you have nothing valuable to contribute. All you have is lies, bigotry, and arrogant misunderstandings. I know you think you’re smart—because your dishonesty…

Frothing so much you can’t even construct a sentence, at this point?

Says the lying bigot who has reached a point where they can’t even try to make a coherent argument (or, if I’m being optimistic and hoping that no one is as terrible, dishonest, and foolish as you’re presenting yourself to be, the troll who has lost interest).

Took you this long to come up with “Other factors must be present”? It’s almost like what I’ve been saying from the beginning is that it doesn’t generally, but that people can respond differently in certain circumstances! Oh wait, that’s exactly what I said. YOU, however, claimed it couldn’t in response (“Morphine…

First, you mean “depressant rather than stimulant”, or “excitatory/inhibitory”, but again, you’re not actually competent to have a discussion on this—and neither’s directly relevant to whether it’s potentially hallucinogenic per se. We are not talking about “normal” response here—because as I’ve said several times,…

So, your answer is that morphine does not produce hallucinations—your long-winded, unwarrantedly arrogant answer in which you demonstrate that Google University still isn’t an accredited school for a reason.

It’s very clear who’s full of shit here. It’s also clear that you won’t answer a simple question, because you don’t have an answer you like.

I mean, yes, I agree wholeheartedly, since the original is racist garbage so giving a movie about a slave rebellion the same title is just the right shade of fuck you. But do you think it’s too late for that to be successfully reappropriated?

No, I didn’t read your whole description. I’m not your copyeditor, and I actually KNOW what dissociation is an what class morphine belongs to etc. Because I actually have the training in the subject. And I’m not going to read it now because it’s not my job to educate you, nor am I inclined to because it’s not as…

Since what you said was either trivial stuff you copied from google or, where you made relevant points here, lying nonsense, all I’ve “learned” is that you’re trying really hard to make a valid point that justifies your arrogant bigotry, but you’re failing pretty hard. But, again, keep trying! A thousand monkeys at a…

“Ok, dude, so here we go, let’s have our fun talk of the day. I will of course ( if you had any doubt) describe what an incompetent/impostor you are.

I am amused at how desperately you’re trying to exculpate yourself for the inaccurate and stupid things you have been saying all along for the sole misogynistic purpose of casting doubt on this woman’s testimony. But I won’t let you off the hook, dude. You’re an impostor and you know it.