bjg
Brian
bjg

Or that they are trying to correct a medical mistake they paid for. Just because it's elective doesn't mean they deserve to have poorly done procedures.

Empathy: it's not just for kind people.

I had some strong responses to these pageants until "GI Jane" made it to Miss USA in 2008. She won Miss Utah as a student from my university when I went back to get my degree. Bunch of other female students came out of the woodwork having gained some confidence from her example. All of them I knew where strong

How does she make the men look silly? She looks foolish mimicking others, but I fail to see how the men being mimicked look silly.

The top of a butt or the other things you describe are merely a starting point. After that, I just need the depraved landscape of my own mind. Really, that's all I need at all, but pictures are nice too.

It's low in a world in which the most popular porn frequently implies exploitation and nonconsent of female actresses and features violent gangbangs/sex and degradation of women.

It really isn't - some of us (myself included at times) forget that not everyone wants or needs to see something super graphic or kinky to get stimulated.

He also likes partially clothed ladies and "naughtiness" - its not THAT weird, right?

Hahaha, a well designed car is enough for my husband to masturbate to ;)

Well Jez, you've given my husband all the spank bank material he needs for the day.

YES! Oh, my god. Just writing the words "Is there any proof?" or "Could this just be for money?" got one dogpiled on by every one who was ever looked at funny by that strange guy down the street that one time when they were 15.

If you pay off somebody to get rid of a claim, you submit a settlement agreement to the court, and the suing party is barred from bringing the suit again. You don't just pay someone off and HOPE they never bring the lawsuit again.

I always appreciate your tempered response. Limited information should give pause about personal judgement. On the financial side though it seems like a judgement of malpractice and an unwanted total hysteroctomy should warrant a fairly significant penalty, though saying what is such an ethical landmine.

Not to be overly picky, but a hysterectomy does not put you into menopause. That only happens if you have both ovaries removed, aka oopherectomy. If the cervix is left behind, as is often the case in non-cancer cases, most people can't even tell they don't have a uterus anymore.

Except no one has paid Egan. He's dropped the lawsuits on his own, and all the reports say that he's free to bring them again if he wanted to. Which means there hasn't been any settlement.

But remember, anyone who expressed any doubt about this conveniently-timed lawsuit.... in the one forum where the statute of limitations hadn't run.....right when Bryan Singer's big movie was coming out.....must be a rape apologist and pedophile. At least, that's what the commenters here on Jezebel called me and the

and she replied saying that since it was organic, it must be OK.

Even if they distribute it, I don't see what is to be gained by trying children as adults for this, and having them labelled paedophiles for the rest of their lives. I can understand going after the adults that watch it and redistribute it, but not the kids themselves.

If that were to happen then you go after the adult exploiting the teenagers but you can't keep prosecuting teenagers and have them be labelled paedophiles for the rest of their lives because they filmed themselves having sex once when they were stupid teenagers. And yes, sure, make it illegal for teens to film

that's what I mean. Girls and boys have been prosecuted for filming themselves because technically it is footage of a minor engaging in sex acts and therefore child pornography, however I do think they law should be able to distinguish between consenting teens being idiots by filming themselves having sex, and actual