bitenuker--disqus
Bitenuker
bitenuker--disqus

I don't disagree. But there's just a certain flavour to this being the central line of left-aligned armchair pundits that I find unpleasant.

Oh my god, if she hosts again with her next album cycle and drops a Judy on us I will die.

It's so weird that of all the centre-right politicians the Democrats have put up over the years, Hillary is the one who gets slammed for being "unfeeling" and "calculating". I wonder why that might be.

When you think about it, it carries a huge degree of difficulty as an impression because if you don't have the voice that accurate it's not going to work. I just love imagining the reactions to Ariana Grande sitting in the writers' room and, when asked if she has any celebrity impressions up her sleeve, saying,

Oof, I hate that odious punchline. That impression is so amazing it deserved better.

I'd say that her vocal impressions were generally better when she did them on Fallon's show, but like, there's a brilliant specificity to her Celine Dion that I'm not surprised is lost on some (and by 'some', I don't just mean heterosexual men).

I also think that blunt-force TV like House of Cards has shied people away from the kind of ambiguity American Crime is interested in. I think this is a show that trusts that people will be able to take what it has given the audience and draw conclusions about what life will be like for these people beyond that.

What exactly does the show gain, thematically, from providing more definitive resolutions for these characters though? And logically, having watched them develop over 10 episodes, you should have a good enough idea of them to make a decision for yourself about what they do next.

You might wanna find a better name to use than Kristen Stewart's, given that she's won a pretty hefty slew of awards including the French equivalent of an Oscar. Might I suggest: Abigail Breslin?

I agree with you. Having Mac actually blunder his way through being accepting of his homosexuality feels like it would be the risky option rather than, as Dennis describes in the review, just continuing to do the safe thing. But at the same time, I get why the show wouldn't go there. It's tricky. But mostly I just

Adventure Time's ratings have always fluctuated wildly though, in fairness. I'm not super sure why that kind of existentialism would put people off given how much there was of it in seasons four and five.

I don't know if I would say Adventure Time's surreal bent and general weirdness has done anything other than garnered it a bigger audience, but I take your point.

Yeah I dunno, I've always loved this show at its most experimental because it tries for things no other show does. It doesn't always succeed, but that's how experimental art works. But I know a lot of people approach AT pretty rigidly with their favoured storyboard artists and everything, which I don't really

Nobody watched it?

100%

Wait, why don't people like S6?

I don't know if there's a basis for your shtick, but hey, I'll give you one thing, which is that you have posted multiple comments on this website.

I can envision McKinnon being the Ghostbusters breakout, landing her own series/film lead and bailing on SNL. Then Strong, Bayer and Bryant all drive around the country in a van solving mysteries together.

The 7th episode of most Mad Men seasons is generally the one where the show breaks form in some way. Usually it was when the show indulged its weirdness a bit more heavily than others. It's kind of hard to explain, and honestly it's a long bow to draw because many Broad City episodes are thrillingly weird, but it

"Working Girls" / "Wisdom Teeth" / "Game Over"