The film 'Zoo' doesn't show any of the video, which I have seen, and it is fucking horrifying. But the documentary is actually very well-made and interesting, more about the community of men who are interested in it than the actual practice of beastiality itself.

If you don't love that movie then somewhere in your brain is a damaged synapse that would otherwise allow you to experience true joy.

I particularly enjoyed the fact that you could still see the shadow of his dong on his leg. Give the cinematographer an Emmy for that lighting choice alone.

The gay gasp the Whoopi reveal elicited from me was truly terrifying.

Yeah, it's tricky. They'd have more luxury to experiment on cable. The half-hour special definitely would've worked better - even just as a post-script to the season itself.

I don't think the interviews were bad, per se, because I think the episode works as is. But I also don't really know what they told us that the show couldn't have done just in telling the story/incorporating media coverage etc. Honestly, an hour of commercial TV just isn't enough time or space to do what this episode…

I'm thinking Sebastian's role in the story is to reveal a lot about Kevin and what he's hiding.

Huffman clearly called Cate Blanchett and demanded the name of her make-up artist on Blue Jasmine.

I daresay someone has already said this, but where the hell is Please Like Me?

I still think "A Year in the Life" is more brilliant.

They're fun as fuck, and I always appreciated that she owned their trashiness rather than trying to pass it off as something more high-minded or genuine that it really is (see: Katy Perry, who is the true nadir of modern pop music).

Gosh, you'd think that a 23 year old woman testifying at a deposition with the full weight of a corporation - which is now refusing to let her break her contract to keep away from the person who sexually abused her - bearing down on her would've just told the truth! There's no way she could have been compelled to lie…

This whole "by only showing gay people in bad situations means you're condoning gay misery and encouraging people to hate them" is some of the dumbest bullshit I've ever heard, and sadly it's far from the first time I've seen it said about gay TV/film. Because I don't think there's anything point-scoring about what…

Yes, I knew about McDonald; that might have been the source of my confusion, since I know he was the one who brought Ridley into the project (and producers are rarely given credit as legitimate creative forces in their own right). I figured they'd either have LGBT writers on staff or at least heavy consultation with…

It made my day when it was announced, because I'd been shouting about the need for it to happen for years. More than happy to pay it forward.

The BBC are doing it as a TV show, which is really the best way for the story to be told.

I mean, true, but we also don't really appreciate great production design enough. Now there's a supercut I'd like to see.

The entire show is about how societal power structures subjugate those who don't fit the norm. All we've been seeing all season are the toxic environments Taylor and Eric are surrounded by. It's clear that Eric grew up around his mother's bilious attitude towards homosexuality, and it's clear that Taylor has repressed…

"It feels too much like the show agrees with Eric's little brother instead of the opposite."

Agreed. And an extra-enthused upvote for your name/avatar.