bitemekinja
bitemekinja
bitemekinja

I am okay with vigilante justice in my name in lieu of an arrest record that may never happen depending on any number of circumstances or legal technicalities, and which only follows a perp for life under ideal coordination by a combination of imperfect government entities, and which even then does nothing to

Believe me, they're not.

Megan's Law has some serious issues that need addressing. I relate the story my mother, an Human Resources director at a 400-person company, once told me:

Corporate charity is horrible, is it? Tell that to cancer survivors and their families, surely many of whom owe their lives to a corporate donation.

I fail to see what's "ignorant" about it, semantically speaking. Jobs's opposition to charitable giving was well-documented. Perhaps you refer to the possibility that Jobs chose to donate privately; however we have no evidence to suggest such a philanthropic M.O., and plenty more to suggest the opposite. It's not

Ask my girlfriend which way is more comfortable to hold our iPad, and I guarantee she'll answer "Portrat". It's natural (for her along with many others no doubt, perhaps yourself included) to hold the thing from the side. Holding from the side in landscape moves the center of mass further from her dainty little

Not to speak ill of the dead, but **** Steve Jobs.

Repeating what FORD said: that's a myth. Pure myth, and spreading it around will only lead to life imitating the urban legend.

What an asshat driver; such a shame he took out innocent parties in the process.

I agree with you. It doesn't matter what the specific descriptors in question are: if a third party describes you as something you're not, it will tarnish people's perception of you. Such incidents give people a reason to wonder if you're trustworthy, if you're hiding something else, speculate on why you never

Well said!

$3,800 and probably made out of the cheapest (if snazziest-looking) 430 stainless money can buy, thereby ensuring it becomes a very expensive cube of corrosion within mere years.

To clarify: I did not point out the vast difference betwixt our education and social standing. I pointed out that people often presume certain things regarding our union based on their perception of the difference, judging by my first-hand interactions with said individuals. Those are two distinctly separate

I'm a white guy engaged to an Asian woman, but we didn't get together because of Asiaphilia: she is a gorgeous woman who caught my eye independent of her race, and it turns out she's a lovely person on the inside too (and definitely not demure or submissive). However we have to dispel misconceptions about my assumed

Jesus friggin' lord... Cool story and all, but would it kill you guys to correct the litany of grammar issues before reposting here?

Am I really the first to mention McQueen's slightly dinged up '68 Mustang from Bullitt? Say it ain't so!

Ha, exactly what I was thinking! E39 clutches are decidedly fragile...

Glad none was taken; killjoy snark aside, I sincerely didn't intend any character assassination. Thanks also for realizing my issue was specifically with your advice to prohibit mutually-impaired sex; surely this is something we can agree to disagree over.

Well said, thank you. That's the crux of the matter for us fellas: we're not human breathalyzers (especially not when drunk ourselves) so it's a bit unfair to expect us to know, unerringly, at what point a "yes" is not a real/consensual "yes". This is especially true when interacting with relative strangers as in a

Not that I didn't appreciate your question-and-answer forum, but I hope you'll understand if I pass on some of your pointers. Mrs. schumachiavelli would kick me out of the house if I told her we couldn't have drunk sexytime on our rare kid-free nights out based on some anonymous killjoy's internet advice. (No