bisynaptic
bisynaptic
bisynaptic

you’re not turned off by the stickly calves and chicken feet, or the don’t-touch-me black forest of facial hair? how about the pretentiously over-developed upper chest/shoulders on an otherwise unremarkable, medium-sized frame? he looks like he’s going to crush his own collarbones with the muscle tension, any minute

just so we’re clear: santa claus is still white—right?

what will he do when the first mom sues him after her kid gets injured on his jungle gym?

i can’t unsee this...

probs b/c the women in douthat’s life keep telling him that the problem’s not him—“women” just don’t like sex.

if you read the comments of arnheim further up in this thread, you’ll get your answer.

you’re like one of the people who thought stephen colbert was playing it straight on his show “the colbert report”.

you’re... not... that... bright... are you.

i have a feeling you also don’t know the meaning of the word “irony”. and also, “facetious”, “sarcastic”, and, more generally, “satire”.

he has a really impressive adam’s apple.

i wouldn’t be at all surprised, if, on top of everything else, trump has a case of prosopagnosia, or face-blindness. it’s a real condition—and it effects the stupid as well as the brilliant (oliver sacks confessed to having a case of it).

incompetence is seriously underrated as a cause for historical events.

i’m sorry, but this is total b.s. it is no accident that the marchers were male—and it is not irrelevant to point that out. male dominance (let’s call it “patriarchy”) predates—and trumps—EVERY OTHER FORM OF OPPRESSION. racism might be learned, but sexism is reptilian.

let’s be honest: if it had been poor people’s property, it would have been possessed a LONG time ago. just the fact that the dues went unpaid for so long is a consequence of the ultra-wealthy status of the property owners.

i hate to be a wet blanket, but: is any of this news? hard to recognize a trend (as the title declares) without knowing what the data at earlier time points are. trump did, in fact, lose the popular vote, so the fact that “a majority of registered voters (53 percent) now say they are mostly pessimistic about the

“why?” why bother trying to explain what motivated someone to do what she did? dunno, maybe because people in general try to make an effort to understand other people and what makes them tick. it’s apparently an inescapable part of “the human condition”. and, as it turns out, the people who perform this mental

the preceding paragraphs weren’t excuse; they were explanation. perhaps you have difficulty telling the difference?

haha! is the “yours always” also from the transcripts?

PV didn’t. read the second paragraph.