Yeah, send out stupid shit on Twitter. It’s a cure-all.

OK, Achmed. Did you take your meds today, mental case?

Jesus, you fuckers are sensitive.

If it was truly efficient, we’d have done it long ago.

So long as the SCOTUS agrees with me and my opinion, I feel totally comfortable disregarding yours.

We do it for welfare. Let’s fucking scrap that too!

Well, if you don’t like the analogy the guy made, skip it.

Trump knows he’s going to be remembered for tax reform and that’s a much more important legacy than the wall. He’s just coasting at this point.

Democrats are worse. They had the same amount of control of Congress and the POTUS in 2009 - 2011 and didn’t do shit to pass this legislation.

That’s not an answer to my question.

Did you watch the video? I’d characterize it as a high-speed chase.

It’s still a good analogy for the point he was making.

They had every reason to approach with a weapon drawn. If you flee from the cops and lead them on a high speed chase, that’s going to happen about 99.999999999% of the time, particularly if it’s at night and you’re acting/driving erratically.

You didn’t even read the synopsis of the Plumhoff case in the link I sent you, did you? That chase and this one are similar.

How did NAFTA benefit Wall Street?

OK, faggot.

If you initiate a police chase, the odds are like 1,000,000 to 1 that when the cops finally stop you the decision to possibly use deadly force has already been made.

It’s a good analogy to use to get his point across.

The best part of the video is the suspect leads the cops on a high speed chase for however many miles, acts like an idiot and . . . then lawfully stops at a stop sign where the cops surround his car and shoot him. Looks like Mr. Accountant picked a wrong time to start following the law!

Globalization is a natural thing. No one forced anyone to outsource labor to China, Mexico, etc. People in those countries wanted work and were willing to do it for cheaper wages than US citizens.