You’re confusing the voices in your head with anonymous commenters on the internet.

No, Marxism definitely allows for public property.

If you’re citing yourself (that’s not a real thing by the way) why did you put it in quotes? Are you Karl Marx?

So . . who would that be? Everyone’s got free money and you expect each person to clean toilets or develop microprocessors or till land or do anything but sit around and drink all day?

Fortunately, every new day brings something else to talk about and you can just forget about all the prior crazy stuff!

And the risk of a “crazy dictator” coming to power and wrecking any communist system has been shown, repeatedly, to be a consequence unaccounted for by Marxist economic theory.

The only difference is Finland hasn’t collapsed yet.

I think that guy’s a little too upset.

So you understand that public property is the property of the State.

That’s you quoting (maybe) from something you didn’t cite.

After reading people trying to imitate HamNo and doing a terrible job at it, I have to admit I kind of miss the weekly HamNo blog filled with economic idiocy.

If everything is freely given who is going to work to bother creating those goods and providing those services?

Thanks for the word salad! Deeeee-licious!

Who made you the moderator? Or are you just prone to tantrums that public internet comment sections allow for reasonable people to voice their own opinion?

Someone’s upset that his echo chamber isn’t echoing to his satisfaction, I see. Always fun!

If you’ve cited anything, I missed it. Please point it out to me or re-cite it.

You’re not aware that Marx allowed for what he called “collective property.”

If you’re working, you’re not subject to the new regulations. That’s true in Kansas and every other state.

Uh Oh. Someone’s upset that an infidel was allowed into the echo chamber!

Yeah, I guess I did miss the point. It concerns me greatly, by the way. I can’t stop thinking about it.