I think it reads a lot like this:

I’m pretty sure we both know it’s unlikely you’ll ever be deluded enough to think you’re superior to anyone.

The Bill of Rights are called “Amendments” to the Constitution for a reason. If they had been a part of the Constitution to begin with, they would not have amended it to include them. FFS.

Why is that the case? Because if you did, you’d also wipe out all the people that are not insurgents in the area and, by doing so, you’d enrage the entire population and end up turning everyone against you.

You must not have read some of these comments.

So you’re a psychology major, I take it? I knew it was some soft science bullshit but I wasn’t sure which one. How’s Starbucks treating you?

You may not have said they’re the most over-ruled . . .

It says I don’t give a shit about what you think about me to correct any typos. If I totally misused a common saying, I wouldn’t change that either.

I don’t think that’s accurate. A poster upstream said that the frequency of false rape allegations mirrored that of other felonies and came in at 2 - 10%. That’s hardly an “urban legend” and I Googled it myself to see if it was accurate and, lo and behold, it was.

First they came for Bill Maher, and I was silent. Then they came for Garrison Keillor, and I cried. Then, one day, Hamilton Nolan came after me . . .

I have to admit, the fact the left is vilifying Garrison fucking Keillor is pretty amazing.

One could argue that the left may not be as smart as it likes to think it is since you keep losing elections left and right to your opponent.

Where did I say it was the most overruled Circuit?

LOL - you care enough about your comments downstream you have to edit them to make it look like you don’t know how to write “stock in trade” instead of the moronic “stock and trade”?

No, I think you’re exactly like a FOX News viewer. You want your echo chamber to remain undisturbed just as they do.

I’m not sure if it was you or not but someone made a comment that false rape allegations happen with the same frequency as other felonies - somewhere between 2% and 8% of the time.

Tinkerbell, tell me why you think they didn’t just storm the compound if what you say is true? Do you think they simply chose to waste all the resources they did for . . . what, again?

Sorry you’re sad but, given that you’re an anonymous person on the internet, you should save all your feels for people/things that actually care about them. I’m not in that group.

LOL - Another example of the left-wing equivalent of a FOX News viewer! Sorry to disrupt your echo chamber but, really, listening to opposing opinions is generally more enjoyable than simply limiting yourself only to opinions that mirror your own.

I don’t have a fucking clue what you’re going on about. I agree that you’re puzzled.