bindolaf
Bindolaf
bindolaf

There was a time when I mocked the sort of person who’d use payday loan services. I figured any goober who’d read the “Borrow $200, Pay Back $203!” sign and not understand that the implicit caveat in that advertisement was, “Assuming you pay your loan back the same day you took it out,” was probably a mark who was

It’d be nice to see people have the same level of outrage towards Trump and his actions that they were able to muster about the last season of Game of Thrones. 

It is the deep-seated, existential dread evoked by witnessing the rising of that Lovecraftian baby-sun, gazing down upon our works with a disinterest born of the knowledge that we are but a passing dream for minds that sleep for eons.

Implement a feature that allows a streamer to ban anyone from their channel that used a particular emote (from the list of emotes that are frequently used in a racist manner) within the past 1-5 minutes. The first time a user gets banned from a channel via this moderation feature, they receive a warning. The next time

Only to fucking discover it didn’t actually save them a penny as their currency and economy immediately ate shit, just like the Remain campaign, economists, and, uh, literally everyone else was saying.

Well none of this would be a problem if they would just hire her at a nice all-white charter school. Someone turn on the DeVos signal!

They all think he’s some kind of magic orange savior, who will come charging to the rescue on a white horse as soon as they get caught being publicly sexist &racist &c. You see this a lot in those drunken viral cellphone videos, where the attacking baboon abruptly invokes Trump’s name out of nowhere.

Does this bitch REALLY think that Trump combs through his tweets and personally addresses each one? Like he ignores all the people dunking on him but reads, responds, and solves problems for all the supporters that tweet at him??

Yep there were 2 sides to this story:

I’m with you on this, but can we maybe disentangle the debate about reproductive rights from a discussion about eugenics? There are many good, sensible arguments for family planning services. “Those people have too many babies!”, which is the terminus of just about every debate I’ve ever had that discusses

Sounds something more fun in theory than in practice. I remember when people complained you couldn't walk into every building in GTA4 back in the day, but at the same time... That doesn't sound fun in actual gameplay.

Slightly unrelated but I came across this wedding photo the other day and cracked a smile.

-_-

Brits got game.

Mom???!!!!

Um nope. Don’t you read history? The last time that America’s leaders looked weak in front of the British monarch, the King of England burned the White House to the ground. If the queen thinks that Trump isn’t strong enough to beat her in hand-to-hand combat, she will sent the redcoats back to DC.

There’s only one logical way to do this.

Having not been exposed to the medical field intentionally, I can’t say for sure if it’s specifically American, but it is a thing in America. It’s not something you’ll hear everywhere, and it does seem to be changing gradually, but it’s a historical problem that’s taking it’s time moving entirely in to the history

My experience in neuroendocrinology research groups has been that both males and females of otherwise identical cohorts are included at the outset of any large study. For experiments involving exogenous hormonal exposure (particularly estrogen, its precursers, and estrogen-like molecules), outcomes DO tend to be less

I have a PhD in psychology from a department with a strong cognition and neuroscience bent. I remember asking one of our seminar speakers - a semi-prominent neuroscientist - whether he had found or even considered gender or racial differences in a study he was presenting (which had clear, glaringly obvious potential