AI learning from the internet. What can go wrong?

So has my salary....

(V) small and kind of experiments sounds good to me. I am a sucker for stars, ships, lighthouses and maps, so quite a few of your games looked interesting even at first glance.

ThanksThanks

When I look at the image contained in the article, I see zero problems. It’s as much “AI” as a “smart” paintbrush in Photoshop. I wasn't commenting on AI art in general. I was commenting on a torch-and-pitchfork mob, ready to denounce an artist, who did work for WotC, over nothing.

I won't. I have decided on 30 euros.

I tried GTA V and I couldn’t play long. The opening was pretty horrible to begin with and then I felt weird playing a Black criminal-in-the-making, with all that (I felt) cringy lingo. I have no problems playing “evil” characters, mind, or doing “bad deeds” in games, but GTA V was just... too much for this milquetoast…

I missed it somehow, sorry. You have authored (is that the word? Created, I guess) a ttrpg? Which one?

Oh, the humanity!

I don’t care about multi-player. I'll wait till RDR is down to 30 Euros, then I'll nab it.

I have been waiting for this for a long time. I never played RDR and I loved RDR2 (I consider it the best game ever made). I have 60-something euros on my PS store account, have had them for months, because nothing tickled my fancy.

Eh, number 8 has some merit. The rest is bad. Still, written by a computer.

The fact that this is at all possible is pretty impressive. The “poetry” itself is... mediocre at best. Now, there are humans who write much worse verses, but the Machine has yet to reach even the footstools of the great human poets.

Sure. AI should not mess with art. This is a case where the artist himself used AI - a glorified Photoshop bot more like, to finish and touch up *his own* art. What are we even talking about here? People are out with pitchforks and torches to lynch WotC for... what exactly?

Is it more “soulless “ than using Photoshop? I don't know... I am against using people's art without their permission, but what Shkipin did is just use another kind of brush. The article seems a little dramatic to me, as do some responses here.

Am I missing something? Shkipin drew the art himself, then used AI to speed up the editing/polishing process. This is bad somehow? I don't understand.

I care too. Would the sentence not imply “emigrate from the US to Russia” (thus being correct)? Since the speaker is in the US, not in Russia.

:)

You guys crack me up, thanks :)

So two girls were afraid that their mother was dying and, while rushing her to hospital, had to contend with the extra stress of almost being killed by Officer Moron. Excellent.