Argue why they’re right besides “because the law is on their side”, bootlicker

US copyright law is dumb and bad, and if you only support laws as they exist then you literally are in support of a perpetual status quo, which is genuinely pathetic and spineless

It’s not the pattern recognition, dum dum, it’s about the moral stance on their actions. No wonder you’re so triggered by exaggerated language, you think words are violence. Get some constitution, lawyer lover.

Gamerbrain is terminal if you equate mod videos of IP with cockfighting. 

No you just moralize about how nobody should do anything about it.

Attack the argument, dorklord

So you believe if a lawyer vigorously defends something it’s inherently good?

He wrote 3 sentences, snowflake

Nintendo should knock it off, and provoking someone into continuing their unreasonable stance for the public to increasingly take notice is cool and good, actually

Microsoft could have paid for the commission of an exclusive Call of Duty game, like Sony did for all of their third party exclusives, but they won’t. They don’t pay for anything they can’t wholly own anymore. 

Yeah they pretty much just admitted to the exact thing Sony was charging them with, which is that the moment that 10 years is up they’ll yank the rug out and close the door. 

The AV Club has been on a bitching and moaning spree about this film, Gabrielle Sanchez threw her “support women” mantra out the window to attack Rachel Zegler for saying people online are being way too personally mean about the movie. This is how they choose to pay rent.

For anyone who has scrolled down to see if reading this comment is worth it: nope.

Weird take of “person who has suffered symptoms of long covid decides ‘fuck it’ is bad now.” I have yet to hear any kind of plan or idea for how anyone is meant to proceed from here despite waves of vaccines that isn’t just “everyone wears n95 masks until there are no cases ever again”, and people’s frustrations about…

It’s not tiny, you dopes tell me I can’t buy comic books anymore owned by WB because it goes to business deals with her. You’re completely disconnected from reality and only doing this for terminal online clout.

Disappointing to whom, people online who are deeply unpleasant and have no impact on the buyer’s life who post for clout about how tangentially related products from WB as a parent company also give money to JK? Wow, what a loss. I’m as devastated as a non-player of this Babys First AAA game can be, I can’t sleep at…

It’s not an easy ask when people go down the rabbit hole telling me not to buy my weekly DC comics because its owner gives money to JK Rowling. “There’s no ethical consumption under capitalism” means just that.

You couldn’t even be bothered to correctly write “anti-trans” much less edit a correction in. I guess you care more about speedily posting than invoking the violence perpetuated against a group of marginalized people.

In any case, the argument that boycotting does good against JK is a valid one to make, but it also…

That’s what makes good art an experience, rather than simply absorbing a story or looking at a painting.

The story of Death Stranding is perfectly good, in particular the fact that the way it all comes together leaves a lot of room for interpretation that the generally straightforward legend does not. It says a lot that you repeatedly denigrated the game’s story simply because you don’t enjoy your own rumination on it.…