You called it. She spent years selling a product that didn’t exist, not one that didn’t work as advertised. But in the process she filled the boardroom with former (and future, hi Mad Dog!) cabinet members to sand down some of the regulatory friction.

At this point “faulty” is far too generous a word to use for her blood tests. The technology factually did not work, Theranos and Holmes knew it did not work and yet they sold and deployed it anyways.

Holmes is either a con artist or a dipshit. If she’s a con artist, then her kitten poster platitudes are part of the scam and she doesn’t really believe them. If she’s a dipshit, no platitudes can cure her of her incompetence.

I’d like to read a psychological analysis of her by a medical professional. Because pretty much from day one, she struck me (and my untrained eye) as more than just a little weird. Is she narcissistic? Is she some other kind of crazy?