bilious72
Bilious72
bilious72

you’re an idiot, about as dumb sounding as your username

Believing a man is a man and a woman is a woman is not “Trans hate”. It’s called believing in science. Ironically, I see so many “Science is real” signs and yet they refuse to believe what science says about gender.

Why are Catholic values shitty? Catholics value human life, not “do what feels good”. You may not agree, but have some respect. 

Jezebel is that way >

Kelly is very overweight herself...so...”

So (i) sticking your fingers in your ears when a simple claim, supported by science, offends you and (ii) non-sequitur calls for civil war—*both* in a single Jezebel article and its comment thread.

The guy quoted in this article said none of these things. He simply noted that there are correlations between susceptibility to the worst effects of covid, and obesity. The response to this claim that Jez has written up here is not even a response, it’s a bunch of deflection (you can get healthy food at regular old

Almost everyone who suggests we should lose weight, exercise, eat better, or take vitamins to help prevent the worst effects of the virus gets attacked by left leaning media. This man is rich and owns an expensive grocery chain so he is wrong. As a nurse I have yet to treat a marathon runner for amputation related to

~2 million EVs were built last year, worldwide.

California also needs to implement an actual fire mitigation policy that will stop the fires from being catastrophic events. Just ruining their power grid isn’t sufficient.

California is already having power supply issues, let’s add 2 million or so new EVs to the grid each year...

Could be worse,  what if you were in California and there were major blackouts?

In 20 years we’ll be like Cuba, trying to keep all the old ICE cars alive.

So I rent an apartment, where do I charge my car? 

Do we need to check up on Raph? I mean, I know times are bleak but this beginning of this article is dark.

All great questions. This article should be a thought exercise along the lines of “what would happen if the ban went into effect tomorrow?”

Instead, we have from-the-hip word vomit with absolutely zero critical thought put into it. Like most things Raph and Erik spit out, this take seems to be nothing more than being

This is a shitpost right? Is shitposting allowed on the front page?

How are the 44% of Californians who aren’t homeowners going to charge this raft of affordable BEVs? As long as you’re telling the rest of us how to fix the world for you why not just ban all fossil fueled vehicles, including ships and aircraft, tomorrow? That’s only slightly less silly than your proposal. 

Doing what they’re doing is a far more complicated policy decision than you’re identifying - with plenty of complications and problems that make 2035 an aggressive deadline. Just a few of them: