FYI, you’re talking to one of Splinter’s more intelligent racist trolls.

Believing this is a good bit, but I repeat myself.

A.

FYI, you’re talking to one of Splinter’s more intelligent racist trolls.

FYI, you’re talking to one of Splinter’s more intelligent racist trolls.

FYI, you’re talking to one of Splinter’s more intelligent racist trolls.

Not for a second time, no.

An irrelevant hypothetical, owing to nobody suggesting a mental health check for ownership of said items. Less sophistry, more substance please. Stick to guns.

Have you considered banning chemiclord? 

Are there any Central American countries with a birthrate above 3.0? 

BarackaObama left 10 comments yesterday. The Sovereign hasn’t commented since Sunday, but has 19 comments in the past seven days. 

I love you, you fucking ape.

So you were joking when you pretended this was a genuine argument. I figured as much.

That’s because they aren’t used in the vast, vast majority of crimes. Mass shootings on the other hand...

Change over time:

This one I’m going to use forever in future discussions with people who claim fewer guns won’t mean fewer homicides. It’s almost as good as his ‘9/11 was worth it’ take.

No worries. Send a complaint, log out for a few days. When you see any of them around in future, tell whoever they’re talking to that they’re dealing with a troll. I figure that’s as much as anyone can do on this site.