I mean prejudice is an ideology, anyone can adopt it. There are literally black nazis. After all its prejudice, it doesn’t make sense anyway 

Prejudice is an ideology. As any ideology, anyone might adopt it. Its that simple 

Victim blaming aside, this is literally just her admiting she doesn’t know how to parent. Most children can deal with "go sit down im busy" without throwing a tantrum, or, you know, shooting you 

“some language might seem stigmatising “

The problem here is neither the parent nor the teacher nor the child, not really. Its the literal smoking gun present in this case

Its not that white people can't legislate for black people or vice versa. But a legislature that CAN do that would be diverse by default. Thus these margins are evidence of bias and inability to legislate successfully for all its constituents 

Its not that white people can't legislate in favour of black people or vice versa. Its that a legislature that IS capable of doing that would naturally be by default diverse. Thus such large margins represent a massive problem 

But the point is that he did when his opponent wouldn't have. You cant present stuff like this without the context of who the guy is running against. Like did you want this to happen or did you want a person who would not just not have done this but also actively made things worse? 

Ofc presidents create jobs, in the sense that policy sets up the circumstances for employment/employing and investment allows more businesses to get of the ground. Likewise the government is what’s supposed to help people get the relevant skills and enter the job market when they are unable to do so by themselves.

A frank conversation about race labeled “Don’t Call Me Karen.” featuring only white speakers? Really? 

You have this backwards. Its not that writers of colour write “objectionable shit”, its that its deemed “objectionable shit” BECAUSE they are writers of colour.

“Chow, who had a concealed weapons permit”

Remember, this is the party of “free speech” that’s against “cancelling”. Allegedly

You do of course realise that all content mods like this implament is ripped from already extant pokemon games right? Im not saying this as a bad thing, but that content has to be made by someone, and Nintendo can't just rip the models from pokemon coliseum to put in scarlet and violet or smth 

Shes... A real person? How can a real person trigger your uncanny valley response? It doesn't get more dehumanising than that

And? What does that have to do with anything? This comment just reads like a sanitised “why did they put a back person in muh European fairy tale”

I mean objective reviews very much exist, or at least ones closer to being objective. For example pointing out a plot hole is entirely objective.

If they are really concidering targeting the people who literally spend a good portion of their profits donating to conversion therapy and international anti lgbtq causes you know they’ve gone fully stupid

Bro its literally them getting rid of bugs. You patch out bugs, that's what you do 

The elden ring thing is just the result of no difficulty modes combined with seamless pve and ovp. If all your stuff works the same in single player as multilayer AND you have no difficulty modes so that players can progress past an unreasonable difficulty spike, you end up having to rebalanced the whole thing