Yra but by that logic half life and dota are indie games as well. See how it doesn't work?
Yra but by that logic half life and dota are indie games as well. See how it doesn't work?
But plenty of indie games have publishers. There are literally publishers that only publish indies
I highly doubt anyone who rightfully dislikes Rowling would do something like this, seeing as it'd be entirely pointless and ppl who hate Rowling have very valid reasons for it thus have enough brains to realise that
But they didn’t tho, because they could always fall back to creative commons thus, if not restoring trust, at least making sure ppl dont switch. Thus you really didn’t see a significant exodus from its ecosystem
Ppl have compared unity with wotc. But that’s not accurate. For one wotc planned licence changes were due to an entirely new version of its product, and with terms much less ludicrous than these.
What do you mean somehow? It's not doing a which leads to b not happening its that simple
A company can't be anti capitalist what are you on about, its a COMPANY. That profit isn't their sole motivator doesn't change anything.
Its neither. Its a specific form of capitalism. Capitalism itself is a purely economic system it implies nothing about any other aspect of it. Ppl trash the planet and hide money because weak regulatory environments allow em to, in strong regulatory environments where they couldn’t it wouldn’t be less capitalism
Its the other way around. We DON’T have consumer choice now and have monopolies NOW. Specific media are unique products. A customerAdoesn’t want A show, they want THAT show (or game). A show being available in one specific service is monopolistic and offers 0 choice. If you wanna see the disney show go to disney and…
“We took it out eventually because we wanted everyone to enjoy the game exactly how we intended it to be enjoyed, and not judged based on any trends. We really wanted the world that we designed to be interpreted by the players exactly how we aimed it to be, so we took out factors that could be a little risky.”
Lets not kid ourselves, this is a game made by horny dudes who only see women as sex objects intended for horny dudes who only see women as sex objects. The fact that it embraces the fact it stars a hypersexualised sexist stereotype doesn’t mean it doesn’t still star a hypersexualised sexist stereotype.
Why is there this bizzare tendency to try to overthink things in every case like this. Its an action game featuring a hypersexualised female protagonist that constantly spouts stereotypical “this is how women talk right?” stuff every five seconds. There’s no deeper meaning, there’s no reclaiming shit. If you like the…
The manga industry is truly a cesspool of exploitation from the big publication that is hell bend on cultivating a culture of work thst literally kills its creators
Because it looks like every low budget direct to dvd movie ever made ans because it has literally 0 advertisement
I mean if you only care about pire content and not the repetitiveness or quality of it sure
You nightmare scenario is literally how it is now, except you can't replace it yourself to boot
Isn't this the mode where you can have dead and retired people, or footballers from better times in their careers? And its all based on stats garnered in different kinds of circumstances and contexts? How is having women any different?
I mean in this mode you xan literally have dead people to your team but women is too far?
A team from a segment of the population who isn’t encouraged to the same degree or trained to the same degree to participate in the sport and who gas a smaller pool of candidates, less funding, smaller prices and worse facilities lost to a team where exactly the opposite is the case, and this is a surprise somehow
If you care about this you are by default a massive sexist, and also massively stupid. Literally there’s 0 reason to care about this