bigyak
Dimitris Tz
bigyak

Remember guys, these are the people that want us to believe that they are pro free speech, against corporate regulation and pro small state. As shown clearly here/s

Exactly. This is what people don't get. Ai is stupid as brick, its just a massive feedback loop. It can't understand it wrote something because it doesn’t even understand anything, it just knows that i goes before am which goes before hungry based on deep learning, data, and feedback, it understands exactly 0 of those

Meh. Chat gtp is a language models, it provides plausible examples of the spoken or conversatorial writen word. It doesn’t present correct ones. If you ask it about something it doesn’t have data for, it will just... Confidently lie. As it did here of course. And this is its fundamental nature it will never get better

I very much want it. But i want it the same way i want nuclear power

Smart people may be smart but they are people, with all the biases and stupidity that comes with it

the AI chatbot claimed it penned every single paper.

Yea i was always under the impression that the point of accruing capital and assets was making them work FOR you, not you for them, otherwise what’s the point exactly?

It makes sense when you conceptualise it as taking a master artist role, a running your own atelier kind of thing. You suddenly have immense creative control and input over others, and still get to add personal work

Frankly im surprised it took him this long. Ive had nopped out at 30 people 

I also bet you haven't heard of many other things not in your circle, it doesn’t mean they magically aren't popular the universe doesn’t revolve around you 

Actually incredibly based. Dude started as a youtuber, he didn’t wanna be ceo, didn’t train in buisiness management and leadership, he just started via making videos and then his company got huge. But same way you hire someone qualified to run your cameras after a while, it only makes sense to do so here as well

By the way, this would have literally been the best place to implamented a numerical morality system as these spells are supposed to corrupt your soul

It can't be too judgemental, the game is already judging all your actions. Heck one could very well argue its not judgmental enough and that it rans foul of the worldbuilding because you know, these spells are supposed to taint your godamn soul 

I mean you can do it you just need to have the values be sane, unlike here. 

But you don’t need to be with the templars to have their powers, nor does having an assassin class mean you actually have to be an assassin

It absolutely does, in the way factions are framed. The Legion isn’t framed as the rightful saviors of the wastes, they are framed as murderous slavers which is what they are. They are framed as the villains, you can just join them if you want.

But the game already judges your characters morality by the way it frames your actions and your role in the narrative. Its art there’s no art without a political or moral stance. You think spec ops the line isn’t judging your character because it doesn’t have a morality system? Or god of war? Or dishonored?

But you just described what is identical to a facet of how almost every morality system functions in 90% of games. If you are an evil asshole some people and factions won’t want to associate with you, or will comment on it.

When the game rewards you for picking a choice it removes the whole choice

Characters will react visually and audibly to seeing the player cast an Unforgivable, but we don’t have a morality system that punishes them for doing so–this would be too judgemental on the game maker’s part