If French Canadians have nothing to do with their government then who the fuck has? Its not a dictatorship. Its not a monarchy. Someone fucking voted for them. 

The extend people go to hate on immigrants is honestly so baffling some times. Like bro there are so many things you could spend that time and money on. But not. Gotta hate on the homie from Bangladesh thats filling essential positions, boosting the local economy and paying you taxes 

The anglosphere!!!

But allof what you say is entirely irrelevant. Sure there was discrimination against frsncophones. How is that in any way relevant to judging this law here and now

In terms of immigration, the bill provides that the period during which an immigrant can communicate with the government in a language other than French is only six months

Unity is literally one of the best game engines there are oit there. The catch is its free but you have to show the logo if you don't pay. So 1+1= being associated with shobelware instead of hearthstone and pillars of eternity 

Ah yes because you will shoot up your office when the layoffs are announced and you still work there and not, lets say, after you actually get fired. BRILLIANT!

Ofc they sell well. Its the switch. It offers inherent benefits like portability and docking wherever, and for some people its their only system. Why wouldn't people want ports? 

I mean dems don’t lose for some arbitrary reason, they lose because of voter suppression and people not going to vote for them to balance enoughfor that in the name of ideological purity.

So basically the article is bullshit and this is a legit political move in an effort to appoint more dem judges and present it as a betrayal is misrepresenting it eh? 

Wow what an incredibly bad faith take provided with no context of what this position entails or what powers it actually wields and what the benefits of the other nominations might be

You arent arguing in good faith. You took two sets of different circumstances and said they are basically the sane thing thus obliterating any nuance

I still remember that article defending gatcha mechanics and ppl being like

Not necessarily. 1 dollar from 1000 users is the same as 1000 dollars from one user

It is not digital ownership. Its a receipt of providence. If you buy an nft you do not own the associated piece of art or any rights related to it, you own the nft. You are literally buying the contract itself and nothing else. Anything else would require normal non nft contracts,thus rendering the nft irrelevant 

None of the things you posit benefit any ways from nfts. In fact they already exist without nfts. 

An nft isn’t a contract its proof of providence. There is no need for nfts for contracts because contracts a) are defined by their enforceability and what rights they confer while nfts do neither and b) work just fine without blockchain,if not better because the anonymous and non refundable nature of blockchain is a…

An nft is not the art. Its an online receipt proving providence. Think of the receipts for actual paintings that guarantee its the original, who had it before etc. Now imagine having that receipt but nit the painting itself. Thats what an nft is

Yea man you are totally right. Now that said i have these collectible beanie babies to sell you. I guarantee they will appreciate in value 

I mean habds down dude did illustrate how thoroughly broken the youtube copyright strike system is. Dude did so in tge worst possibles way, burned all beidges with the community fucked over many innocent members of the community and is now being sued.