bigtimes-old
bigtimes
bigtimes-old

@AdamKaoru: Well you know, hindsight and all that.

@CaptainJack: Wait a second, if people trust them, they make billions?

@david86: Well, that's awesome.

@quitcherbichinn: I don't think Gizmodo's butt hurts. I do think they saw a dramatic spike in traffic when they got their hands on that iphone prototype, and they're trying to capture that lighting again.

@FritzLaurel: See, why? It's a company who's products I generally enjoy, but it's still a company. Vote with your dollars, not your heart.

@AdamKaoru: Yyyyyyeaaaah, but I really dislike that response. The whole "don't hold it like that" response was a bad idea.

@funakoshi.gichin.shotokan: I think people have a real problem with frank honesty. He just said what he thinks, which is honest. He didn't say what people want him to say, which would be dishonest. Yes, Apple cultivates this cult of personality, but it's time to get rid of that, and not flat-out expect or demand a

@Sukebe: Having a problem with the iP4's reception really is expecting the supernatural.

@SpartanFry: No, no, no, then you would still be attenuating the antenna.

@adhir: I always hated that horse anyway.

@SpartanFry: I know, maybe we can stop beating the horse with the stick, and tape the iphone to said stick.

It's for the employees.

@Go Vols!: eh, the only problem there is that none of that information could be independently verified. People think they're being lied to. I wouldn't be surprised to see tomorrow's Gizmodo headline "Sign our petition to get a third party to verify iPhone dropped calls claims"

@Panther: Well, get to work, I'm sure you have a solution that they'd love to have.

@CaptainJack: You know, I think this whole thing boils down to if we think we're being lied to or not. Maybe we are, but what if we're not? What if everything Apple is saying is exactly how Apple feels about the whole thing? What then?